ERIC Number: ED670339
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2024
Pages: 119
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-3021-8408-5
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Evaluating United States Air Force Hearing Conservation Educational Materials and Interventions
Thomas Dominguez
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Utah
Noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus are two of the most prevalent service-connected disabilities of United States military veterans. Educational materials from active-duty, continental United States (CONUS) Air Force bases were evaluated for compliance with regulations and assessed for understandability, actionability, and readability to establish a baseline. Educational materials were received from 44 of 61 (72%) bases and overall mean compliance (67 educational materials reviewed by 3 evaluators, n = 201) was 84 ± 21%, 83 ± 21%, and 88 ± 21% for United States Air Force (USAF), Department of Defense (DoD), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) criteria, respectively. Overall mean understandability was 75 ± 12% and actionability was 89 ± 22%. Overall mean readability (n = 67) was grade level 10.68 ± 1.68 on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) scale. A scoping review was conducted to describe the current literature on field-microphone-in-real-ear (F-MIRE) use in attaining overall personal attenuation ratings (PARs) for hearing protection devices. Training, interventions, and regular retraining generally had a positive influence on F-MIRE PARs. Most PARs did not exceed relevant NRRs, indicating a significant potential for PAR improvements and the need for a standardized comparison method. An F-MIRE system was used in a pilot study to evaluate subjects without prior hearing conservation program training so PARs could be determined both before and after one of two interventions: USAF training material or a modified NIOSH QuickFit (MNQ) protocol. Post-intervention, half (8 of 16, 50%) of USAF and a majority (13 of 17, 77%) of MNQ participants had a PAR84 above the 15 dBA target PAR. Median [delta]PAR84 increases from baseline were 4 dBA for USAF and 5 dBA for MNQ, showing no significant difference between the two interventions. Recommendations for the DoD include: (i) updating the two-page pamphlet to meet all compliance requirements, while increasing understandability, actionability, and readability, and distributing the pamphlet as a template; (ii) updating regulations to incorporate best practices from industry (e.g., roll-pull-insert); and (iii) use F-MIRE technology to attain quick, objective, and individualized PARs for all hearing conservation program employees, rather than only those exposed to greater than 95 dBA. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
Descriptors: Armed Forces, Military Personnel, Military Training, Military Schools, Hard of Hearing, Instructional Materials, Veterans, Auditory Tests, Curriculum Development, Compliance (Legal), Best Practices, Training Methods
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A