Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Gyawali, Binod | 3 |
| Beigman Klebanov, Beata | 1 |
| Bruno, James V. | 1 |
| Burstein, Jill | 1 |
| Cahill, Aoife | 1 |
| Chen, Lei | 1 |
| Davis, Lawrence | 1 |
| Evanini, Keelan | 1 |
| Harackiewicz, Judith | 1 |
| Lee, Chong Min | 1 |
| Leong, Chee Wee | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textChen, Lei; Zechner, Klaus; Yoon, Su-Youn; Evanini, Keelan; Wang, Xinhao; Loukina, Anatassia; Tap, Jidong; Davis, Lawrence; Lee, Chong Min; Ma, Min; Mundowsky, Robert; Lu, Chi; Leong, Chee Wee; Gyawali, Binod – ETS Research Report Series, 2018
This research report provides an overview of the R&D efforts at Educational Testing Service related to its capability for automated scoring of nonnative spontaneous speech with the "SpeechRater"? automated scoring service since its initial version was deployed in 2006. While most aspects of this R&D work have been published in…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Test Scoring Machines, Speech Tests
Bruno, James V.; Cahill, Aoife; Gyawali, Binod – ETS Research Report Series, 2016
We present an annotation scheme for classifying differences in the outputs of syntactic constituency parsers when a gold standard is unavailable or undesired, as in the case of texts written by nonnative speakers of English. We discuss its automated implementation and the results of a case study that uses the scheme to choose a parser best suited…
Descriptors: Documentation, Classification, Differences, Syntax
Beigman Klebanov, Beata; Priniski, Stacy; Burstein, Jill; Gyawali, Binod; Harackiewicz, Judith; Thoman, Dustin – Grantee Submission, 2018
Collection and analysis of students' writing samples on a large scale is a part of the research agenda of the emerging writing analytics community that promises to deliver an unprecedented insight into characteristics of student writing. Yet with a large scale often comes variability of contexts in which the samples were produced--different…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Context Effect, Automation, Generalization
