Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Daniel Gooch | 1 |
| Futagi, Yoko | 1 |
| Hemat, Ramin | 1 |
| John Woodthorpe | 1 |
| Kevin Waugh | 1 |
| Kostin, Irene | 1 |
| Marian Petre | 1 |
| Mark A Slaymaker | 1 |
| Mike Richards | 1 |
| Sheehan, Kathleen M. | 1 |
| Zuckerman, Daniel | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mike Richards; Kevin Waugh; Mark A Slaymaker; Marian Petre; John Woodthorpe; Daniel Gooch – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Cheating has been a long-standing issue in university assessments. However, the release of ChatGPT and other free-to-use generative AI tools has provided a new and distinct method for cheating. Students can run many assessment questions through the tool and generate a superficially compelling answer, which may or may not be accurate. We ran a…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Artificial Intelligence, Cheating, Student Evaluation
Sheehan, Kathleen M.; Kostin, Irene; Futagi, Yoko; Hemat, Ramin; Zuckerman, Daniel – ETS Research Report Series, 2006
This paper describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an automated system for predicting the acceptability status of candidate reading-comprehension stimuli extracted from a database of journal and magazine articles. The system uses a combination of classification and regression techniques to predict the probability that a given…
Descriptors: Automation, Prediction, Reading Comprehension, Classification

Peer reviewed
Direct link
