Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 2 |
| Inferences | 2 |
| Natural Language Processing | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Language Styles | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
| Andreea Dutulescu | 1 |
| Danielle S. McNamara | 1 |
| Denis Iorga | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
| Mihai Dascalu | 1 |
| Perret, Cecile | 1 |
| Stefan Ruseti | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAndreea Dutulescu; Stefan Ruseti; Denis Iorga; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2024
The process of generating challenging and appropriate distractors for multiple-choice questions is a complex and time-consuming task. Existing methods for an automated generation have limitations in proposing challenging distractors, or they fail to effectively filter out incorrect choices that closely resemble the correct answer, share synonymous…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Artificial Intelligence, Attention, Natural Language Processing
Download full textAllen, Laura K.; Perret, Cecile; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2016
The relationship between working memory capacity and writing ability was examined via a linguistic analysis of student essays. Undergraduate students (n = 108) wrote timed, prompt-based essays and completed a battery of cognitive assessments. The surface- and discourse-level linguistic features of students' essays were then analyzed using natural…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Writing (Composition), Short Term Memory, Writing Ability
