Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Assistive Technology Outcomes… | 6 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textBausch, Margaret E.; Ault, Melinda Jones – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2012
The reauthorization of IDEA mandates that students with a disability must be considered for assistive technology (AT). However, in order to implement the mandate, teachers and related service personnel must be knowledgeable about many aspects of AT. The purpose of this study was to gauge the extent to which personnel preparation programs believe…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Professional Development
Van Laarhoven, Toni; Munk, Dennis D.; Chandler, Lynette K.; Zurita, Leslie; Lynch, Kathleen – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2012
This article describes several stages in the integration of assistive technology (AT) into and across the curriculum of a teacher education program. The multi-year initiative included several projects and strategies that differentially affected faculty ability to integrate training and evaluation in using AT in their coursework. All strategies…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Preservice Teacher Education, Teacher Education Programs
Bauer, Stephen M.; Flagg, Jennifer L. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2010
A standard and comprehensive model is needed to evaluate and compare technology transfer systems and the stakeholders within these systems. The principle systems considered include federal laboratories, U.S. universities, the rehabilitation engineering research centers (RERCs), and large small business innovation research programs. An earlier…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Technology Transfer, Program Effectiveness, Educational Technology
Leahy, James A.; Lane, Joseph P. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2010
Historically, the assistive technology (AT) industry is made up of small to medium size companies serving relatively small markets with products characterized as "niche" or "orphan" products. Presenting opportunities to AT companies that are created by outside sources is difficult. Presenting such opportunities to companies serving larger markets…
Descriptors: Technology Transfer, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Barriers
Lartz, Maribeth N.; Stoner, Julia B.; Stout, La-Juan – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2008
The purpose of this study was to investigate the perspectives of Deaf students attending a large "hearing" university regarding their use of assistive technology (AT). Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants and responses were videotaped and transcribed from sign language to English. A collective case…
Descriptors: Deafness, College Students, Student Attitudes, Assistive Technology
Floyd, Kimberly Kris; Smith Canter, Lora Lee; Jeffs, Tara; Judge, Sharon A. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2008
Despite the legislative mandate for assistive technology (AT) consideration and the tenacity of researchers, educators, and practitioners to develop more proficient readers at younger ages, cohesive and comprehensive emergent literacy technology planning has not been sufficiently developed for preschool children with disabilities. The purpose of…
Descriptors: Assistive Technology, Emergent Literacy, Preschool Children, Disabilities
