Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Barriers | 3 |
Program Implementation | 3 |
Research Problems | 3 |
Delivery Systems | 2 |
Integrity | 2 |
Administrative Principles | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
College Programs | 1 |
Community Colleges | 1 |
Consultation Programs | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bers, Trudy | 1 |
Chereji, Elizabeth | 1 |
Hilt, Lori M. | 1 |
Kazdin, Alan E. | 1 |
Perepletchikova, Francheska | 1 |
Younger, Donna | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bers, Trudy; Younger, Donna – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2014
This chapter will examine characteristics of first-year experience programs in community colleges, with specific attention to the extant research about their effectiveness, the ways in which research and program delivery can be integrated, and the unique challenges of delivering FYE programs and conducting research about them in community colleges.
Descriptors: Community Colleges, College Freshmen, Student Experience, College Programs
Perepletchikova, Francheska; Hilt, Lori M.; Chereji, Elizabeth; Kazdin, Alan E. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2009
Treatment integrity refers to implementing interventions as intended. Treatment integrity is critically important for experimental validity and for drawing valid inferences regarding the relationship between treatment and outcome. Yet, it is rarely adequately addressed in psychotherapy research. The authors examined barriers to treatment integrity…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Treatment, Validity, Integrity, Psychotherapy
Group of Eight (NJ1), 2008
The release of the "Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2007" by the Australian Government in 2007 was welcomed by Go8 (Group of Eight) institutions, particularly in relation to the improvements and broader scope of the matters covered by Part A of that Code. However, as foreshadowed by the Go8 during the consultation…
Descriptors: Public Agencies, Foreign Countries, Government School Relationship, Administrative Principles