Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Barriers | 2 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Computer Software | 2 |
Teacher Attitudes | 2 |
Teaching Methods | 2 |
Technology Integration | 2 |
Writing Evaluation | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Autumn B. Hostetter | 1 |
Cassandra Linnertz | 1 |
Elizabeth Nestle | 1 |
Grace Frazier | 1 |
Junifer Leal Bucol | 1 |
Miaflora Tucci | 1 |
Napattanissa Sangkawong | 1 |
Natalie Call | 1 |
Tristan James | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Thailand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Autumn B. Hostetter; Natalie Call; Grace Frazier; Tristan James; Cassandra Linnertz; Elizabeth Nestle; Miaflora Tucci – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Psychology instructors frequently assign writing-to-learn exercises that include personal reflection. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can write text that passes for humans in other domains. Objective: Do students and faculty rate a reflection written by GenAI differently than reflections written by students? Do students and…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty, Undergraduate Students
Junifer Leal Bucol; Napattanissa Sangkawong – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
This research paper employs an exploratory framework to evaluate the potential of ChatGPT as an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool in teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in Thailand. The main objective is to investigate how well ChatGPT can assess students' writing using prompts and pre-defined rubrics compared to human raters.…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Teaching Methods, English (Second Language)