NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1221954
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2019
Pages: 4
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1470-8175
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
When Both K[subscript m] and V[subscript max] Are Altered, Is the Enzyme Inhibited or Activated?
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, v47 n4 p446-449 Jul-Aug 2019
Enzyme activators lower K[subscript m] (the Michaelis constant) and/or raise V[subscript max] (the asymptotic reaction velocity at infinite substrate concentration); conversely, inhibitors raise K[Subscript m] and/or lower V[subscript max]. But what if an effector moves both K[subscript m] and V[subscript max] in the same direction? Uncompetitive inhibitors, which decrease both K[subscript m] and V[subscript max] by the same factor, are the most common example of this. A less well-known example occurs often when crowding agents are added to the buffer in order to mimic the environment commonly encountered "in vivo". Crowding agents tested on different enzymes have been shown to have every conceivable effect on K[subscript m] or V[subscript max], causing them to rise, fall, or stay the same. In this article, a mathematical analysis is presented allowing biochemists to judge whether an effector that causes K[subscript m] and V[subscript max] to both move in the same direction serves as an inhibitor, an activator, or most surprising, as both.
Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A