Descriptor
Source
| Business Education Forum | 3 |
Author
| Fritz, Robert L. | 1 |
| Goins, L. Keith | 1 |
| Jewell, Carolyn S. | 1 |
| Limback, E. Rebecca | 1 |
| Smith, Douglas C. | 1 |
| Swope, John A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Missouri | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLimback, E. Rebecca; Jewell, Carolyn S. – Business Education Forum, 1998
A Missouri study of 669 business education teachers (50% response) and a North Carolina study of 82 (59% response) found that block scheduling is viewed positively by most teachers, but it requires changes in planning and use of a wider variety of teaching techniques. (SK)
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Business Education, Business Education Teachers, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSwope, John A.; Fritz, Robert L.; Goins, L. Keith – Business Education Forum, 1998
In North Carolina, 114 marketing teachers and principals agreed that block schedules affect attitudes and performance and require more planning and staff development. They disagreed whether block schedules change the pace of instruction, reduce dropout, and affect participation in school-to-work programs. (SK)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Block Scheduling, Business Education, High Schools
Peer reviewedSmith, Douglas C. – Business Education Forum, 2002
Business teachers who are also Future Business Leaders of America advisors (65 with block scheduling, 19 without) perceive block scheduling differently in their roles as teachers and as advisors. Although they support it as teachers, they have serious reservations as advisors because of its impact on student organizations. (Author/JOW)
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Business Education, Business Education Teachers, Faculty Advisers
