NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 50 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas D. Griffin; Allison J. Jaeger; M. Anne Britt; Jennifer Wiley – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2024
Relying on multiple documents to answer questions is becoming common for both academic and personal inquiry tasks. These tasks often require students to explain phenomena by taking various causal factors that are mentioned separately in different documents and integrating them into a coherent multi-causal explanation of some phenomena. However,…
Descriptors: Documentation, Inquiry, Grade 8, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henne, Paul; O'Neill, Kevin – Cognitive Science, 2022
Mike accidentally knocked against a bottle. Seeing that the bottle was about to fall, Jack was just about to catch it when Peter accidentally knocked against him, making Jack unable to catch it. Jack did not grab the bottle, and it fell to the ground and spilled. In double-prevention cases like these, philosophers and nonphilosophers alike tend to…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Prevention, Logical Thinking, Individual Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jamie Amemiya; Gail D. Heyman; Caren M. Walker – Cognitive Science, 2024
How do people come to opposite causal judgments about societal problems, such as whether a public health policy reduced COVID-19 cases? The current research tests an understudied cognitive mechanism in which people may agree about what "actually" happened (e.g., that a public health policy was implemented and COVID-19 cases declined),…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Evaluative Thinking, Logical Thinking, Social Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goddu, Mariel K.; Lombrozo, Tania; Gopnik, Alison – Child Development, 2020
Previous research suggests that preschoolers struggle with understanding abstract relations and with "reasoning by analogy." Four experiments find, in contrast, that 3- and 4-year-olds (N = 168) are surprisingly adept at relational and analogical reasoning within a causal context. In earlier studies preschoolers routinely favored images…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Logical Thinking, Abstract Reasoning, Causal Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aßfalg, André; Klauer, Karl Christoph – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
We consider the proposition that reasoners represent causal conditionals such as "if John studies hard, he will do well in the test" as a causal model in which the antecedent ("John studies hard") is a potential cause of the consequent ("John does well in the test"). Some studies suggest that reasoners ignore…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Causal Models, Evaluative Thinking, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goddu, Mariel K.; Gopnik, Alison – Developmental Psychology, 2020
Novel causal systems pose a problem of variable choice: How can a reasoner decide which variable is causally relevant? Which variable in the system should a learner manipulate to try to produce a desired, yet unfamiliar, casual outcome? In much causal reasoning research, participants learn how a particular set of preselected variables produce a…
Descriptors: Young Children, Causal Models, Logical Thinking, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dündar-Coecke, Selma; Tolmie, Andrew; Schlottmann, Anne – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020
Background: Causes produce effects via underlying mechanisms that must be inferred from observable and unobservable structures. Preschoolers show sensitivity to mechanisms in machine-like systems with perceptually distinct causes and effects, but little is known about how children extend causal reasoning to the natural continuous processes studied…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Logical Thinking, Elementary School Students, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mayrhofer, Ralf; Waldmann, Michael R. – Cognitive Science, 2016
Research on human causal induction has shown that people have general prior assumptions about causal strength and about how causes interact with the background. We propose that these prior assumptions about the parameters of causal systems do not only manifest themselves in estimations of causal strength or the selection of causes but also when…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Bayesian Statistics, Inferences, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rehder, Bob – Cognitive Science, 2017
This article assesses how people reason with categories whose features are related in causal cycles. Whereas models based on causal graphical models (CGMs) have enjoyed success modeling category-based judgments as well as a number of other cognitive phenomena, CGMs are only able to represent causal structures that are acyclic. A number of new…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Logical Thinking, Causal Models, Graphs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moreira, Patricia; Marzabal, Ainoa; Talanquer, Vicente – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2019
The central goal of this research study was to characterise the different types of reasoning manifested by high school chemistry students when building initial written explanations of a natural phenomenon. In particular, our study participants were asked to explain why a mixture of water and alcohol works as an antifreeze. Data collected in the…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Chemistry, Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moreira, Patricia; Marzabal, Ainoa; Talanquer, Vicente – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2019
Understanding how chemistry teachers' interventions shape the reasoning that students express after a lesson is critical to support prospective and in-service teachers as they work with students' ideas in the classroom. In this qualitative research study, we analysed changes in the reasoning expressed by 10th grade students in a Chilean school in…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Chemistry, Grade 10, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Markus, Keith A. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
In their 2016 work, Aguirre-Urreta et al. provided a contribution to the literature on causal measurement models that enhances clarity and stimulates further thinking. Aguirre-Urreta et al. presented a form of statistical identity involving mapping onto the portion of the parameter space involving the nomological net, relationships between the…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Measurement, Criticism, Concept Mapping
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wendell, Joakim – Curriculum Journal, 2018
The topic of this study is how Swedish students aged 15-16 use causal reasoning in history when given a high-stakes task about explaining a historically significant event, the rise of the Nazi regime in Germany. The study is based on student texts from the Swedish national test in history. The student texts are mainly analysed with regards to how…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, History Instruction, Standardized Tests, Causal Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Solis, S. Lynneth; Grotzer, Tina A. – Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2016
The aim of this study was to investigate kindergartners' exploration of interactive causality during their play with a pair of toy sound blocks. Interactive causality refers to a type of causal pattern in which two entities interact to produce a causal force, as in particle attraction and symbiotic relationships. Despite being prevalent in nature,…
Descriptors: Kindergarten, Play, Interaction, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grotzer, Tina A.; Tutwiler, M. Shane – Mind, Brain, and Education, 2014
This article considers a set of well-researched default assumptions that people make in reasoning about complex causality and argues that, in part, they result from the forms of causal induction that we engage in and the type of information available in complex environments. It considers how information often falls outside our attentional frame…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Heuristics, Causal Models, Logical Thinking
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4