NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2021
Score differencing is one of the six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lang, Joseph B. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023
This article is concerned with the statistical detection of copying on multiple-choice exams. As an alternative to existing permutation- and model-based copy-detection approaches, a simple randomization p-value (RP) test is proposed. The RP test, which is based on an intuitive match-score statistic, makes no assumptions about the distribution of…
Descriptors: Identification, Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sakworawich, Arnond; Wainer, Howard – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2020
Test scoring models vary in their generality, some even adjust for examinees answering multiple-choice items correctly by accident (guessing), but no models, that we are aware of, automatically adjust an examinee's score when there is internal evidence of cheating. In this study, we use a combination of jackknife technology with an adaptive robust…
Descriptors: Scoring, Cheating, Test Items, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Xi; Liu, Yang – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2020
In continuous testing programs, some items are repeatedly used across test administrations, and statistical methods are often used to evaluate whether items become compromised due to examinees' preknowledge. In this study, we proposed a residual method to detect compromised items when a test can be partitioned into two subsets of items: secure…
Descriptors: Test Items, Information Security, Error of Measurement, Cheating
Wang, Chun; Xu, Gongjun; Shang, Zhuoran; Kuncel, Nathan – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2018
The modern web-based technology greatly popularizes computer-administered testing, also known as online testing. When these online tests are administered continuously within a certain "testing window," many items are likely to be exposed and compromised, posing a type of test security concern. In addition, if the testing time is limited,…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Guessing (Tests), Item Response Theory
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2018
Wollack, Cohen, and Eckerly suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly extended the EDI to detect fraudulent erasures at the group level. The EDI at the group level was found to be slightly conservative. This article suggests two modifications of the EDI for…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
An increasing concern of producers of educational assessments is fraudulent behavior during the assessment (van der Linden, 2009). Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., Eckerly, 2017; McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is one type of fraudulent behavior. This article suggests two new test statistics for detecting individuals who may have…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Testing Problems, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Romero, Mauricio; Riascos, Álvaro; Jara, Diego – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2015
Multiple-choice exams are frequently used as an efficient and objective method to assess learning, but they are more vulnerable to answer copying than tests based on open questions. Several statistical tests (known as indices in the literature) have been proposed to detect cheating; however, to the best of our knowledge, they all lack mathematical…
Descriptors: Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Statistical Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J.; Jeon, Minjeong – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2012
The probability of test takers changing answers upon review of their initial choices is modeled. The primary purpose of the model is to check erasures on answer sheets recorded by an optical scanner for numbers and patterns that may be indicative of irregular behavior, such as teachers or school administrators changing answer sheets after their…
Descriptors: Probability, Models, Test Items, Educational Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2009
A bivariate lognormal model for the distribution of the response times on a test by a pair of test takers is presented. As the model has parameters for the item effects on the response times, its correlation parameter automatically corrects for the spuriousness in the observed correlation between the response times of different test takers because…
Descriptors: Cheating, Models, Reaction Time, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ostapczuk, Martin; Moshagen, Morten; Zhao, Zengmei; Musch, Jochen – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2009
Randomized response techniques (RRTs) aim to reduce social desirability bias in the assessment of sensitive attributes but differ regarding privacy protection. The less protection a design offers, the more likely respondents cheat by disobeying the instructions. In asymmetric RRT designs, respondents can play safe by giving a response that is…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Social Desirability, Attitude Measures, Privacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J.; Sotaridona, Leonardo – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2006
A statistical test for detecting answer copying on multiple-choice items is presented. The test is based on the exact null distribution of the number of random matches between two test takers under the assumption that the response process follows a known response model. The null distribution can easily be generalized to the family of distributions…
Descriptors: Test Items, Multiple Choice Tests, Cheating, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Charles – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2006
In the context of reviewing an article for this journal (van der Linden & Sotaridona, this issue, pp. 283-304) the topic of unconditional and conditional hypothesis testing came under consideration. While this is hardly a new issue (consider, for example, arguments regarding the chi square vs. Fisher exact test of independence for a 2 x 2…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Educational Testing, Item Response Theory, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fox, Jean-Paul – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2005
The randomized response (RR) technique is often used to obtain answers on sensitive questions. A new method is developed to measure latent variables using the RR technique because direct questioning leads to biased results. Within the RR technique is the probability of the true response modeled by an item response theory (IRT) model. The RR…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Probability, Markov Processes