NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 49 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonathan Hoseana; Andy Leonardo Louismono; Oriza Stepanus – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2025
We describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted…
Descriptors: Graphs, Color, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Shiqi Ke; Kang Lee – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Unproctored and teacher-proctored exams have been widely used to prevent cheating at many universities worldwide. However, no empirical studies have directly compared their effectiveness in promoting academic integrity in actual exams. To address this significant gap, in four preregistered field studies, we examined the effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Testing, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anna Filighera; Sebastian Ochs; Tim Steuer; Thomas Tregel – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Automatic grading models are valued for the time and effort saved during the instruction of large student bodies. Especially with the increasing digitization of education and interest in large-scale standardized testing, the popularity of automatic grading has risen to the point where commercial solutions are widely available and used. However,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Grading, Form Classes (Languages), Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip Dawson; Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Helen Partridge – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Educators set restrictions in examinations to enable them to assess learning outcomes under particular conditions. The open book versus closed book binary is an example of the sorts of restrictions examiners have traditionally set. In the late 2000s this was expanded to a trinary to include open web examinations. However, the current technology…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Computer Assisted Testing, Supervision, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benjamin Sorenson; Kenneth Hanson – Journal of Chemical Education, 2023
In spring 2020, the chemical education community faced an abrupt transition from in-person to online classes, which also necessitated online assessments. Building upon an existing three-semester study (F17, S19, and F19) using Rasch modeling and classical testing theory to improve in-person multiple choice exams, this study investigates the impact…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Chemistry, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaveh Jalilzadeh; Mojgan Rashtchi; Fatemeh Mirzapour – Language Testing in Asia, 2024
A challenging aspect of online education is assessment since academic integrity could be violated due to students' cheating behaviors. The current qualitative research investigated English teachers' perceptions of why students cheat in online assessments. Besides, it attempted to find strategies to reduce cheating in online assessments. Twelve…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Coping, English (Second Language)
Chen, Dandan – Online Submission, 2023
Technology-driven shifts have created opportunities to improve efficiency and quality of assessments. Meanwhile, they may have exacerbated underlying socioeconomic issues in relation to educational equity. The increased implementation of technology-based assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic compounds the concern about the digital divide, as…
Descriptors: Technology Uses in Education, Computer Assisted Testing, Alternative Assessment, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gorney, Kylie; Wollack, James A. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2022
Unlike the traditional multiple-choice (MC) format, the discrete-option multiple-choice (DOMC) format does not necessarily reveal all answer options to an examinee. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reduced exposure of item content affects test security. We conducted an experiment in which participants were allowed to view…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L. – Education Inquiry, 2019
A decision of whether to move from paper-and-pencil to computer-based tests is based largely on a careful weighing of the potential benefits of a change against its costs, disadvantages, and challenges. This paper briefly discusses the trade-offs involved in making such a transition, and then focuses on a relatively unexplored benefit of…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Test Wiseness, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bretag, Tracey; Harper, Rowena; Burton, Michael; Ellis, Cath; Newton, Philip; van Haeringen, Karen; Saddiqui, Sonia; Rozenberg, Pearl – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cheating, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Becker, Benjamin; van Rijn, Peter; Molenaar, Dylan; Debeer, Dries – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
A common approach to increase test security in higher educational high-stakes testing is the use of different test forms with identical items but different item orders. The effects of such varied item orders are relatively well studied, but findings have generally been mixed. When multiple test forms with different item orders are used, we argue…
Descriptors: Information Security, High Stakes Tests, Computer Security, Test Items
New York State Education Department, 2024
The New York State Education Department (NYSED) has a partnership with NWEA for the development of the 2024 Grades 3-8 English Language Arts Tests. Teachers from across the State work with NYSED in a variety of activities to ensure the validity and reliability of the New York State Testing Program (NYSTP). The 2024 Grades 6 and 7 English Language…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Test Format, Language Arts, English Instruction
New York State Education Department, 2023
The instructions in this manual explain the responsibilities of school administrators for the New York State Testing Program (NYSTP) Grades 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Tests. School administrators must be thoroughly familiar with the contents of the manual, and the policies and procedures must be followed as written so that testing…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Mathematics Tests, Test Format, Computer Assisted Testing
New York State Education Department, 2024
The instructions in this manual explain the responsibilities of school administrators for the New York State Testing Program (NYSTP) Grades 3-8 English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Grades 5 & 8 Science Tests. School administrators must be thoroughly familiar with the contents of the manual, and the policies and procedures must be followed…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Language Arts, Mathematics Tests, Science Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chirumamilla, Aparna; Sindre, Guttorm; Nguyen-Duc, Anh – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
A concern that has been raised with the transition from pen and paper examinations to electronic examinations is whether this will make cheating easier. This article investigates how teachers and students perceive the differences in ease of cheating during three types of written examination: paper exams, bring your own device e-exams and e-exams…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Testing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4