Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Child Development | 8 |
Cognitive Development | 8 |
Infants | 8 |
Age Differences | 4 |
Visual Stimuli | 3 |
Age | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Individual Differences | 2 |
Infant Behavior | 2 |
Language Acquisition | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Infancy | 8 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wu, Rachel; Mareschal, Denis; Rakison, David H. – Infancy, 2011
It is well established that 2-year-olds attribute a novel label to an object's global shape rather than local features (i.e., parts). Although recent studies have found that younger infants also attend to global rather than local features when given a label, the test stimuli in these experiments confounded parts and shape by varying both or…
Descriptors: Cues, Infants, Attribution Theory, Cognitive Processes
Trauble, Birgit; Marinovic, Vesna; Pauen, Sabina – Infancy, 2010
Recent studies suggest that even infants attend to others' beliefs in order to make sense of their behavior. To warrant the assumption of early belief understanding, corresponding competences need to be demonstrated in a variety of different belief-inducing situations. The present study provides corresponding evidence, using a completely nonverbal…
Descriptors: Infants, Cognitive Development, Infant Behavior, Competence
Laranjo, Jessica; Bernier, Annie; Meins, Elizabeth; Carlson, Stephanie M. – Infancy, 2010
This study investigated two aspects of mother-child relationships--mothers' mind-mindedness and infant attachment security--in relation to two early aspects of children's theory of mind development (ToM). Sixty-one mother-child dyads (36 girls) participated in testing phases at 12 (T1), 15 (T2), and 26 months of age (T3), allowing for assessment…
Descriptors: Mothers, Infants, Cognitive Development, Attachment Behavior
Kaldy, Zsuzsa; Blaser, Erik – Infancy, 2009
What kind of featural information do infants rely on when they are trying to recognize a previously seen object? The question of whether infants use certain features (e.g., shape or color) more than others (e.g., luminance) can only be studied legitimately if visual salience is controlled, as the magnitude of feature values--how noticeable and…
Descriptors: Age, Identification, Infants, Visual Stimuli
Kovack-Lesh, Kristine A.; Horst, Jessica S.; Oakes, Lisa M. – Infancy, 2008
We examined the effect of 4-month-old infants' previous experience with dogs, cats, or both and their online looking behavior on their learning of the adult-defined category of "cat" in a visual familiarization task. Four-month-old infants' (N = 123) learning in the laboratory was jointly determined by whether or not they had experience…
Descriptors: Infants, Classification, Eye Movements, Animals
Olineck, Kara M.; Poulin-Dubois, Diane – Infancy, 2005
The experiment reported here investigated infants' concept of intention, as well as the relation among intention understanding, general productive vocabulary, and internal state language production during the 2nd year. Results from an imitation task indicated that 18-month-olds are better able to differentiate between intentional and accidental…
Descriptors: Imitation, Intention, Infants, Cognitive Development
Bourgeois, Kristine S.; Khawar, Alexa W.; Neal, S. Ashley; Lockman, Jeffrey J. – Infancy, 2005
Although a considerable amount is known about the development of object manipulation during the 1st year, less is known about how infants manually explore surfaces and relate objects to surfaces. To address these issues, 60 infants (20 each at 6, 8, and 10 months of age) were presented hard and soft objects on tabletop surfaces, which varied in…
Descriptors: Object Manipulation, Infants, Tactual Perception, Stimuli
Gomez, Rebecca; Maye, Jessica – Infancy, 2005
We investigated the developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning in an artificial language. Infants were exposed to 1 of 2 artificial languages with utterances of the form [aXc or bXd] (Grammar 1) or [aXd or bXc] (Grammar 2). In both languages, the grammaticality of an utterance depended on the relation between the 1st and 3rd…
Descriptors: Age, Artificial Languages, Infants, Natural Language Processing