NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Krüger, Anne K.; Petersohn, Sabrina – Research Evaluation, 2022
The proliferation of quantitative research assessment has been accompanied by an increasing growth and diversification of digital infrastructure for evaluative bibliometrics. Since the beginning of the 2000s, insights into academic performance provided by a variety of new databases and devices significantly exceed the capacities of the former…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis, Academic Libraries, Librarian Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Horbach, Serge P. J. M.; Oude Maatman, Freek J. W.; Halffman, Willem; Hepkema, Wytske M. – Research Evaluation, 2022
Citing practices have long been at the heart of scientific reporting, playing both socially and epistemically important functions in science. While such practices have been relatively stable over time, recent attempts to develop automated citation recommendation tools have the potential to drastically impact citing practices. We claim that, even…
Descriptors: Citations (References), Citation Analysis, Automation, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mona Farouk Ali – Research Evaluation, 2025
Research evaluation (RE) has experienced a major global transformation prompted by the emergence and increasing usage of digital citation platforms such as the Web of Science and Scopus, opening up avenues for scientometric evaluation (SE). This relatively novel evaluation method represents an essential pillar for the scientific committees for…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Decision Making, Faculty Promotion, Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Abrizah, Abdullah; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Xu, Jie; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Swigon, Marzena – Research Evaluation, 2020
The study investigates the attitudes and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) in regard to citation-based metrics and altmetrics, providing the findings in the light of what might be expected of the millennial generation and in the context of what we already know about researchers in today's 'culture of counting' governed scholarly world.…
Descriptors: Researchers, Novices, Citation Analysis, Bibliometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rodríguez-Navarro, Alonso; Brito, Ricardo – Research Evaluation, 2020
The use of bibliometric indicators would simplify research assessments. The 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF) is a peer review assessment of UK universities, whose results can be taken as benchmarks for bibliometric indicators. In this study, we use the REF results to investigate whether the e[subscript p] index and a top percentile of most…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Peer Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Álvarez-Bornstein, Belén; Montesi, Michela – Research Evaluation, 2020
The topic of acknowledgements has produced abundant research since the 1970s, though, as previous studies point out, the value of acknowledgements has not yet been demonstrated and further research is limited by lack of conceptualization. This study focuses on funding acknowledgements (FAs), considering that funding represents an important input…
Descriptors: Financial Support, Citations (References), Periodicals, Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Youtie, Jan; Solomon, Gregg E. A.; Carley, Stephen; Kwon, Seokbeom; Porter, Alan L. – Research Evaluation, 2017
For decades, there have been calls for bringing the Cognitive Science literature and Educational Research literature into greater and more systematic contact, resulting in the publication of a number of influential papers and the launch of targeted federal funding programs around the turn of the century. This article explores the extent of the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Science, Educational Research, Citation Analysis, Journal Articles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oviedo-García, M. Ángeles – Research Evaluation, 2021
The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases. Journal Citation Reports (JCRs), a reference for the assessment of researchers and for…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Integrity, Credibility, Databases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin – Research Evaluation, 2017
Bibliometrics is successful in measuring impact because the target is clearly defined: the publishing scientist who is still active and working. Thus, citations are a target-oriented metric which measures impact on science. In contrast, societal impact measurements based on altmetrics are as a rule intended to measure impact in a broad sense on…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Citations (References), Citation Analysis, Scientists