NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murphy, Gregory L.; Bosch, David A.; Kim, ShinWoo – Cognitive Science, 2017
Six experiments investigated variables predicted to influence subjects' tendency to classify items by a single property ("rule-based" responding) instead of overall similarity, following the paradigm of Norenzayan et al. (2002, "Cognitive Science"), who found that European Americans tended to give more "logical"…
Descriptors: Preferences, Classification, Predictor Variables, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Stephanie Y.; Ross, Brian H.; Murphy, Gregory L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Category information is used to predict properties of new category members. When categorization is uncertain, people often rely on only one, most likely category to make predictions. Yet studies of perception and action often conclude that people combine multiple sources of information near-optimally. We present a perception-action analog of…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Classification, Logical Thinking, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murphy, Gregory L.; Hampton, James A.; Milovanovic, Goran S. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Four experiments investigated the classic issue in semantic memory of whether people organize categorical information in hierarchies and use inference to retrieve information from them, as proposed by Collins and Quillian (1969). Past evidence has focused on RT to confirm sentences such as "All birds are animals" or "Canaries breathe." However,…
Descriptors: Semantics, Memory, Classification, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murphy, Gregory L.; Ross, Brian H. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2010
In one form of category-based induction, people make predictions about unknown properties of objects. There is a tension between predictions made based on the object's specific features (e.g., objects above a certain size tend not to fly) and those made by reference to category-level knowledge (e.g., birds fly). Seven experiments with artificial…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Classification, Prediction, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, ShinWoo; Murphy, Gregory L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
Barsalou (1985) argued that exemplars that serve category goals become more typical category members. Although this claim has received support, we investigated (a) whether categories have a single ideal, as negatively valenced categories (e.g., cigarette) often have conflicting goals, and (b) whether ideal items are in fact typical, as they often…
Descriptors: Classification, Investigations, Evaluation Methods, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murphy, Gregory L.; Ross, Brian H. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Two experiments investigated how people perform category-based induction for items that have uncertain categorization. Whereas normative considerations suggest that people should consider multiple relevant categories, much past research has argued that people focus on only the most likely category. A new method is introduced in which responses on…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Classification, Inferences, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bott, Lewis; Hoffman, Aaron B.; Murphy, Gregory L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007
Many theories of category learning assume that learning is driven by a need to minimize classification error. When there is no classification error, therefore, learning of individual features should be negligible. The authors tested this hypothesis by conducting three category-learning experiments adapted from an associative learning blocking…
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Classification, Error Patterns, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murphy, Gregory L.; Ross, Brian H. – Cognition, 2005
Studies of category-based induction using different methods have found somewhat contradictory results for whether typical items are a stronger basis for induction. Typical category items are generally more similar to other category items than are atypical ones, and they are also more likely to be categorized into the category in question. We…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hoffman, Aaron B.; Murphy, Gregory L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
Three experiments compared the learning of lower-dimensional family resemblance categories (4 dimensions) with the learning of higher-dimensional ones (8 dimensions). Category-learning models incorporating error-driven learning, hypothesis testing, or limited capacity attention predict that additional dimensions should either increase learning…
Descriptors: Experiments, Classical Conditioning, Probability, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Murphy, Gregory L.; Ross, Brian H. – Cognitive Psychology, 1994
Eleven experiments involving over 200 undergraduate students investigated how categorization of examples influences feature prediction for new examples. Results suggest that category-based prediction generally relies on a single category rather than multiple categories when there is a clear target category. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Classification, Higher Education, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, Brian H.; Murphy, Gregory L. – Cognitive Psychology, 1999
Seven studies involving 256 undergraduates examined how people represent, access, and make inferences about the real-world category domain, foods. Results give a detailed picture of the use of cross-classification in a complex domain. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Food, Higher Education
Murphy, Gregory L.; Smith, Edward E. – 1982
Previous studies have found that an object can be categorized faster at a basic level (hammer) than at either a subordinate (club hammer) or a superordinate level (tool). While some attribute this result to basic categories having more distinctive attributes, other factors might cause this result. For example, basic categories routinely have…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Learning Theories