Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Classification | 3 |
Information Retrieval | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Databases | 2 |
Documentation | 2 |
Medical Research | 2 |
Search Strategies | 2 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Guidance | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 3 |
Author
Thomas, James | 3 |
Hong, Quan Nha | 1 |
Kuiper, Joël | 1 |
Langlois, Alexis | 1 |
Marshall, Iain J. | 1 |
Nie, Jian-Yun | 1 |
Noel-Storr, Anna | 1 |
Pluye, Pierre | 1 |
Stansfield, Claire | 1 |
Stokes, Gillian | 1 |
Wallace, Byron C. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Stansfield, Claire; Stokes, Gillian; Thomas, James – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Manual screening of citation records could be reduced by using machine classifiers to remove records of very low relevance. This seems particularly feasible for update searches, where a machine classifier can be trained from past screening decisions. However, feasibility is unclear for broad topics. We evaluate the performance and implementation…
Descriptors: Classification, Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Research
Langlois, Alexis; Nie, Jian-Yun; Thomas, James; Hong, Quan Nha; Pluye, Pierre – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Objective: Identify the most performant automated text classification method (eg, algorithm) for differentiating empirical studies from nonempirical works in order to facilitate systematic mixed studies reviews. Methods: The algorithms were trained and validated with 8050 database records, which had previously been manually categorized as…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Databases, Information Retrieval, Search Strategies
Marshall, Iain J.; Noel-Storr, Anna; Kuiper, Joël; Thomas, James; Wallace, Byron C. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have proven highly accurate for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) but are not used much in practice, in part because the best way to make use of the technology in a typical workflow is unclear. In this work, we evaluate ML models for RCT classification (support vector machines, convolutional neural…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Accuracy, Computer Software, Classification