NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Toprak, Emre; Gelbal, Selahattin – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2020
This study aims to compare the performances of the artificial neural network, decision trees and discriminant analysis methods to classify student achievement. The study uses multilayer perceptron model to form the artificial neural network model, chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm to apply the decision trees method and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Classification, Artificial Intelligence, Networks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henson, Robin K.; Natesan, Prathiba; Axelson, Erika D. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2014
The authors examined the distributional properties of 3 improvement-over-chance, I, effect sizes each derived from linear and quadratic predictive discriminant analysis and from logistic regression analysis for the 2-group univariate classification. These 3 classification methods (3 levels) were studied under varying levels of data conditions,…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Probability, Comparative Analysis, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth; Campbell, Wenonah; Dempsey, Lynn – American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2009
Purpose: This study tested the accuracy with which the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Level III (CDI-III), a parent report measure of language ability, discriminated children with language impairment from those developing language typically. Method: Parents of 58 children, 49 with typically developing language (age 30 to 42…
Descriptors: Intervals, Language Impairments, Vocabulary, Discriminant Analysis
Meshbane, Alice; Morris, John D. – 1995
Cross-validated classification accuracies were compared under assumptions of equal and varying degrees of unequal prior probabilities of group membership for 24 bootstrap and 48 simulated data sets. The data sets varied in sample size, number of predictors, relative group size, and degree of group separation. Total-group hit rates were used to…
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, Group Membership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Finch, W. Holmes; Schneider, Mercedes K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
This study compares the classification accuracy of linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), logistic regression (LR), and classification and regression trees (CART) under a variety of data conditions. Past research has generally found comparable performance of LDA and LR, with relatively less research on QDA and…
Descriptors: Classification, Sample Size, Effect Size, Discriminant Analysis
Koffler, Stephen L. – 1976
The power of the classical Linear Discriminant Function (LDF) is compared, using Monte Carlo techniques with five other procedures for classifying observations from certain non-normal distributions. The alternative procedures considered are the Quadratic Discriminant Function, a Nearest Neighbor Procedure with Probability Blocks, and three density…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Classification, Comparative Analysis, Discriminant Analysis