NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)7
Source
Journal of Interactive Online…10
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crosta, Lucilla; Manokore, Viola; Gray, Morag – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2016
The current study explored the interaction patterns of a cohort of international students in a Professional Doctorate of Higher Education program (EdD) in order to establish the extent to which (if at all) the cohort evolved into an authentic online learning community. Phase 1 of the study consisted of a retrospective audit of three out of the…
Descriptors: Interaction, Foreign Students, Doctoral Programs, Communities of Practice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roskos, Kathleen; Burstein, Karen; You, Byeong-Keun – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2012
This research reports a two-phase descriptive study of young children's engagement with ebooks conducted in Head Start classrooms. Phase 1 focused on the development of a typology as an analytic framework for observing engagement with ebooks in different formats (shared book; independent book browsing) and across devices (stationary touch screen;…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Video Technology, Observation, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meyer, Katrina A. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2008
This research attempted to test whether the granting of points for receiving the most votes as the "best post" would affect the quality of subsequent postings to online discussions. Five online discussions were held in a small graduate-level course in leadership theory, and postings were coded into Bloom's taxonomy. Quality was defined…
Descriptors: Rewards, Computer Mediated Communication, Graduate Students, Electronic Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Park, Caroline L. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2009
This paper is a report of the replication of a seminal study on cognitive presence in computer mediated conferencing (CMC) by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2001). A comparison of cognitive presence coding by three different researchers is also demonstrated. The study re-ignites debates about what constitutes the segment of CMC data to be coded…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Nursing Education, Replication (Evaluation), Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oriogun, Peter K.; Cave, Diana – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2008
This article empirically validates an existing content analysis scheme and addresses a main concern of researchers about text-based, online transcripts in the form of code-recoding by mapping our scheme to the practical inquiry, cognitive presence model's five phases directly to realise higher-order thinking or critical thinking aspects for our…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Coding, Critical Thinking, Asynchronous Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harrington, Terrance; Staffo, Marilyn; Wright, Vivian H. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2006
The investigators in this study were interested in knowing how faculty uses of a course management system (CMS) helps improve content and instruction, and how faculty attitudes may help or hinder that effort. Seven faculty members were interviewed and the texts were coded and analyzed qualitatively. From the analysis, the investigators derived…
Descriptors: Management Systems, College Faculty, Interviews, Course Content
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lowes, Susan; Lin, Peiyi; Wang, Yan – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2007
As online professional development courses for teachers have grown, the discussion forum has become a locus of considerable research. This study analyzes the discussion forums in four different sessions of a short (4-week) online course for teachers from six schools in three states. This study also compares four methodologies, all of which have a…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Online Courses, Program Effectiveness, Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brescia, William F., Jr.; Swartz, James; Pearman, Cathy; Balkin, Richard; Williams, David – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2004
This study is, as an inquiry into the effectiveness of discussion leadership taxonomy, designed to help online discussion leaders support and facilitate discussions conducted by undergraduates. Participants were approximately two hundred preservice undergraduate students taking an Introduction to Educational Technology course. Each week students…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Peer Teaching, Web Based Instruction, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Spatariu, Alexandru; Hartley, Kendall; Bendixen, Lisa D. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2004
In support of research examining relationships between learner characteristics and the quality of online discussions, this paper surveys different methods for evaluating discussions. The paper will present coding methods used in our own research as well as methods used by others interested in quality online discussions. Key topics include what…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Discussion Groups, Discourse Analysis, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Sue-Jen; Caropreso, Edward J. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2004
Online collaborative learning has typically been studied within the context of learning communities. Little is known about the potential influence of students' personalities on online communication, group interaction, and task engagement among members of a learning community. This study used a mixed-method, triangulation design, involving the…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Personality Traits, Interaction, Group Discussion