Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Cognitive Development | 8 |
Creativity | 8 |
Intellectual Development | 8 |
Creative Development | 3 |
Problem Solving | 3 |
Adults | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Creative Thinking | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Adolescents | 1 |
Adult Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Asia Pacific Education Review | 1 |
Elementary School Journal | 1 |
Human Development | 1 |
Journal of Education | 1 |
Science Teacher | 1 |
Author
Barnett, Mark A. | 1 |
Fearn, Leif | 1 |
Johnson, Scott H. | 1 |
Lawson, Anton E., Ed. | 1 |
McCormack, Alan J. | 1 |
Riegel, Klaus F. | 1 |
Ryckman, David B. | 1 |
Zhang, Li-fang | 1 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhang, Li-fang – Asia Pacific Education Review, 2015
Intellectual styles refer to people's preferred ways of processing information and dealing with tasks. Individuals who have a propensity for using a wide range of styles--always including creativity-generating styles--are said to possess successful intellectual styles. The author argues that teachers should and can encourage creativity among…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Creativity, Student Development, Cognitive Development

Riegel, Klaus F. – Human Development, 1973
Suggests an upward extension of Piaget's theory through dialectic operations because the current theory fails to represent adequately the thought and emotions of mature and creative persons. (CS)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Adults, Cognitive Development, Creativity

McCormack, Alan J. – Science Teacher, 1977
Discusses the use and stimulation of lateral, or divergent, thinking to promote creativity. (SL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Creative Thinking, Creativity
Johnson, Scott H. – 1987
This paper is an attempt to clarify the ambiguity surrounding the issue of adult creativeness. The significance and the limitations of the Genetic Epistemological paradigm in the conceptualization of adult inventiveness are discussed. A framework is suggested that provides an alternative for the study of adult creativeness from a…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Adults, Cognitive Development, Creativity
Lawson, Anton E., Ed. – 1979
The theme of the seventh yearbook of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS) involves the relationship of psychology of teaching thinking and creativity as this activity is performed in a science education context. Eleven chapters follow a foreword by Jean Piaget and the reproduction of Part I of "The Central Purpose of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Creative Development, Creativity, Critical Thinking

Barnett, Mark A. – Journal of Education, 1977
Several early and contemporary theories of the role of play and make-believe are discussed. Studies which have examined the antecedents of social class differences in the young child's play are also explored and their implications for later development and education are analyzed. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Child Development, Cognitive Development, Creativity, Disadvantaged Youth
Fearn, Leif – 1977
A distinction can be made between the term "creativity" and creative thinking skills. Creativity typically refers to a talent for original and masterful production in the arts and sciences, and there is scant evidence that teachers have any influence on creativity of this kind. Creative thinking refers to a group of six thinking skills that if…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Creative Development, Creative Thinking

Ryckman, David B.; And Others – Elementary School Journal, 1976
A study comparing the effect of the Distar reading program and the Lippincott Basic Readers on the cognitive and creative development of 136 kindergarten and first grade children. The major difference between these two approaches is degree of teacher control. Only one significant difference was found between the two approaches. (MS)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Development, Creativity, Creativity Tests