Descriptor
Cognitive Processes | 4 |
Difficulty Level | 4 |
Prose | 4 |
Recall (Psychology) | 4 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Decision Making | 2 |
High Schools | 2 |
Reading Comprehension | 2 |
Attention | 1 |
Conceptual Tempo | 1 |
Educational Objectives | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Benton, Stephen L.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
Seven experiments were performed to address three issues: prose decisions of different levels of difficulty, directed attention effect, and the effects of decisions on memorability of prose among relatively good and relatively poor readers. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Processes, Decision Making, Difficulty Level

Glover, John A.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
A distinctiveness of encoding hypothesis, as applied to the facilitative effects that higher order objectives have on readers' prose recall, was evaluated in three experiments. Results suggest that distinctiveness of encoding may offer a theoretical basis for the effects of adjunct aids as well as a guide to their construction. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Conceptual Tempo, Decision Making, Difficulty Level

Bretzing, Burke H.; Kulhavy, Raymond W. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1979
Four levels of notetaking (summary, paraphrase, verbatim, and letter search) were used to control depth of processing of a prose passage with high school students, who then either reviewed their notes or read an interpolated text. Results favored groups with deeper levels of processing on two post-tests. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, High Schools, Prose
Andre, Thomas; And Others – 1978
In three experiments subjects (college and high school students) read passages which described psychological principles and answered either adjunct application or factual questions while reading. Questions were presented either before, after, or both before and after the parts of the passage that answered the questions. Subsequently subjects took…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, High Schools, Higher Education