NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Matching Familiar Figures Test1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 58 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Naus, Mary J.; Ornstein, Peter A. – Developmental Psychology, 1977
In this study, third and sixth graders were tested in a recognition memory task with short lists of items from either one or two categories to investigate the influence of categorical information on retrieval processes. (Author/SB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lovdahl, Karen E.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Response latencies of 27 learning disabled (LD) and 27 normal control boys (8-11 years old) were compared on a picture-word interference task. Both LD and control Ss exhibited greater interference effects (longer response latencies) when naming pictures (versus naming words) and when categorizing words (versus categorizing pictures). (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kail, Robert V., Jr. – Developmental Psychology, 1976
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Worden, Patricia E. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976
A sorting presentation procedure was used to study the effects of three classification schemes (self-generated, thematic, or taxonomic) on the organized free recall of second and fifth graders. (Author/SB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abkarian, G. G. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1987
Evaluation of classification skills of 88 unimpaired children (grades K, 2, 4, and 6) were evaluated using the Iconic-Symbolic test (IS) of the Muma Assessment Program and follow-up interviews. Results found little relationship between the rationales the children reported using and the classification criteria presumed by the IS procedure. (DB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scott, Marcia Strong; And Others – American Journal of Mental Retardation, 1989
Performance on oddity transfer tasks was used to classify 40 mildly retarded, 6- through 9-year-old and 40 normally achieving children of the same age into their 2 respective groups. High levels of classification accuracy were observed with all 8 oddity types being sensitive to differences between the normally achieving and mildly retarded…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Anderegg, David; And Others – 1985
Forty-seven reading disabled children whose major reading problem was comprehension participated in a study to examine the effects of interventions designed to structure information in encoding and recall through the use of categorization strategy. Short term treatment consisted of four tutorials over a 2-week period. Long term treatment 1…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McFarland, Carl E., Jr.; Kellas, George – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975
Students in grades 4, 6, and 8 were required to indicate whether or not a stimulus word belonged in either of two semantic categories that were held in memory. Results indicated that even for the youngest children semantically similar categories required less search time than dissimilar categories. (GO)
Descriptors: Classification, Cluster Grouping, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Westman, Alida S.; Westman, Ronald S. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1977
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klion, Reid E.; Leitner, Larry M. – Social Behavior and Personality, 1985
Explored the effects of sorting methods upon the content of children's constructs. Results indicated that dyadic sorting and free response methods of construct elicitation differentially affect the types of constructs produced. (Author/BL)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Development, Children, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bjorklund, David F.; Zeman, Barbara R. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1983
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Carolyn P.; Obrzut, John E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1994
This study investigated taxonomic clustering and use of frequency associations as features in the semantic memory of children (n=30 in grades two and six) with learning disabilities (LD). Results suggested that, when individual child-generated word lists (i.e., meaningful) are used, children with LD may not be impaired in their ability to utilize…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Malsam, Mary E. – 1995
This study sought to determine whether categorizing information would increase students' ability to recall that information. Two recall tests, consisting of a list of 30 words in random order and a list of the same 30 words grouped into 6 categories, was developed and administered to 2 groups of 16 fourth- and fifth-grade students enrolled in a…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bayne, Nancy E.; Phye, Gary D. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1977
Subjects were 72 first, third and fifth graders. Stimuli consisted of an initial set of 20 unrelated pictures, and a second set of 20 pictures which could be classified according to four superordinate categories. (MS)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hilgers, Thomas – Written Communication, 1984
Elementary school students evaluated compositions that had been written by peers, then discussed the factors upon which their rankings were based. Results indicate that the bases for evaluation fall into four categories: feelings aroused by text, responses to surface features, responses to text as understood, and responses to craftsmanship. (FL)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4