Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Attention | 1 |
| Cloze Procedure | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Language Proficiency | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 1 |
Author
| Wang, Haiping | 1 |
| Yu, Guoxing | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| China (Shanghai) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWang, Haiping; Yu, Guoxing – International Journal of Listening, 2021
Listen-to-summarize cloze (LSC) tasks are not rare in high-stakes language tests; however, we know little about what test-takers do during the tasks. In our study, we examined 16 students' think-aloud protocols (TAPs) which were recorded while they were completing two LSC tasks. The analysis of the 16 TAPs indicated iterative cognitive processes…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cloze Procedure, Language Tests, High Stakes Tests
