Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Intelligence Differences | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Aptitude Treatment Interaction | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Culture Fair Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Intelligence Quotient | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Monk, John S.; And Others – 1985
This study was conducted to determine how the pattern of learning on an abstract concept, plate tectonics, differed between groups of different cognitive levels, sex, and intelligence quotient (IQ). The intensive time-series design was used to examine the achievement of eighth grade and ninth grade earth science students. The unique characteristic…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style
Download full textPedrini, Bonnie; Pedrini, D. T.
Intelligence tests should be used to help persons; they should not be used to penalize persons. Furthermore, our focus should be on treatment; it should not be on labeling. IQ testers often stigmatize young children and poor persons (children, adolescents, adults). Large groups of Black Americans, Spanish Americans, and Indian Americans are…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Culture Fair Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Intelligence Differences
