NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Baccaglini-Frank, Anna; Antonini, Samuele; Robotti, Elisabetta; Santi, George – North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2014
This study gives insights into how Logo-like microworlds can affect cognitive development related to mathematics education of students with math learning difficulties. In particular, we analyse the case of a 15-year-old student with dyslexia and severe dyscalculia. Among the various cognitive aspects involved, here we delve into the development of…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Learning Disabilities, Mathematics Skills, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Webb, Thomas L.; Miles, Eleanor; Sheeran, Paschal – Psychological Bulletin, 2012
The present meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation in modifying emotional outcomes as indexed by experiential, behavioral, and physiological measures. A systematic search of the literature identified 306 experimental comparisons of different emotion regulation (ER)…
Descriptors: Emotional Response, Perspective Taking, Program Effectiveness, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Bruce; DesRoches, Sarah – New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2010
This chapter identifies three common pitfalls in the use of the concept of empathy in formal social-emotional learning interventions: (1) not distinguishing between affective and cognitive empathy ("equivocation"); (2) overestimating the role of the imagination in empathizing ("Piaget's fallacy"); and (3) not accommodating the developmental and…
Descriptors: Empathy, Educational Environment, Cognitive Processes, Socialization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hamilton, Antonia F. de C.; Brindley, Rachel; Frith, Uta – Cognition, 2009
Evidence from typical development and neuroimaging studies suggests that level 2 visual perspective taking--the knowledge that different people may see the same thing differently at the same time--is a mentalising task. Thus, we would expect children with autism, who fail typical mentalising tasks like false belief, to perform poorly on level 2…
Descriptors: Autism, Perspective Taking, Program Effectiveness, Visual Perception