Descriptor
| Classification | 2 |
| Cognitive Objectives | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Computer Oriented Programs | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Objectives | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Madaus, George F. | 1 |
| Seddon, G. M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Kit of Reference Tests for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSeddon, G. M. – Review of Educational Research, 1978
Authors of the taxonomy made various claims about its properties that concern both educational and psychological issues; these claims have stimulated investigations of the taxonomy's validity. As the taxonomy is now entering its twenty-second year, this review attempts to survey these investigations and appraise the findings. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Objectives, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level
Download full textMadaus, George F.; And Others – 1971
Bloom's taxonomy of the cognitive domain consists of six major levels: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. The purpose of this study is to construct a quantitative causal model for a set of tests designed to operationally define these six levels in order to further explore the validity of the cumulative…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Classification, Cognitive Objectives, Cognitive Processes
