NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 22 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ketabi, Somaye; Alavi, Seyyed Mohammed; Ravand, Hamdollah – International Journal of Language Testing, 2021
Although Diagnostic Classification Models (DCMs) were introduced to education system decades ago, it seems that these models were not employed for the original aims upon which they had been designed. Using DCMs has been mostly common in analyzing large-scale non-diagnostic tests and these models have been rarely used in developing Cognitive…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Test Construction, Goodness of Fit, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Munoz, Albert; Mackay, Jonathon – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2019
Online testing is a popular practice for tertiary educators, largely owing to efficiency in automation, scalability, and capability to add depth and breadth to subject offerings. As with all assessments, designs need to consider whether student cheating may be inadvertently made easier and more difficult to detect. Cheating can jeopardise the…
Descriptors: Cheating, Test Construction, Computer Assisted Testing, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewy, Arieh; Shavit, Shlomo – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
This study examines the structural characteristics of item classification for examination questions. Two different approaches are suggested to testing outcomes of studying history: that of the cognitive psychology and that of the philosophy of history. (MP)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, High School Students
Anderson, Lorin W. – 1999
This paper describes a work in progress on a second edition of "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain," also known as "Bloom's Taxonomy" (B. Bloom and others, Eds., 1956). The new edition will be grounded in the collective wisdom of the original…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives
Dunham, J. L.; and others – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Study conducted by the Aptitudes Research Project at the University of Southern California, under Contract Nonr-228(20) with the Office of Naval Research, Personnel and Training Branch.
Descriptors: Ability, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blumberg, Phyllis; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
First year medical students answered parallel multiple-choice questions at different taxonomic levels as part of their diagnostic examinations. The results show that when content is held constant, students perform as well on interpretation and problem-solving questions as on recall questions. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Quellmalz, Edys S. – Educational Leadership, 1985
Recent advances in theory and research provide a basis for defining higher-order thinking skills and for designing tests of such skills. (MCG)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cizek, Gregory J.; And Others – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1995
Results from 627 examinees taking a health sciences certification examination suggest that test items written purposefully to assess higher order cognitive skills do not provide evidence of assessing different levels of cognitive processing. Results do not support continuing use of a hierarchical cognitive classification dimension for the test…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods
Emmerich, Walter – 1989
The aim of this study was to develop a procedure that could be used to appraise the cognitive features of subject (achievement) tests. Cognitive taxonomies and an accompanying coding scheme were developed and applied to the Graduate Record Examinations subject tests in Psychology and Literature in English. The taxonomies were based on the manifest…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Classification, Coding, Cognitive Processes
Diamond, James J.; Williams, David V. – 1972
Although methods for estimating item difficulty are abundant, little attention has been given to the psychological processes involved when a student responds to a single test item. Mastery of educational objectives is not proven when a student supplies the correct answer to items intended to test these objectives. The student's problem solving…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Educational Objectives, High School Students
Diamond, James J.; Williams, David V. – 1975
Thirteen graduate students were asked to indicate for each of 24 multiple-choice items whether the item tested "recall of specific information," a "higher order skill," or "don't know." The students were also asked to state their general basis for judging the items. The 24 items had been previously classified according to Bloom's cognitive-skills…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Processes, Criterion Referenced Tests, Graduate Students
Scott, Norval C. – 1971
The purpose of this study was to improve the reliability of the Sigel Cognitive Style Test. Post hoc analysis of ninety test protocols had indicated that the original thirty-five card test could be shortened to improve the test's reliability. This analysis also showed that males were responding to certain cards differently from females.…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scott, Marcia S.; And Others – Intelligence, 1986
This study evaluated the diagnostic validity of a task measuring abstract categorization ability in learning disabled (LD) and non-LD children. Data showed that the component of abstract category knowledge that best disciminates LD children from non-LD, is the knowledge of how members of abstract categories differ from each other. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buckwalter, Joseph A.; And Others – Journal of Medical Education, 1981
To determine whether objective test items could measure cognitive processes more complex than recall of isolated facts, the committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons preparing the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination classified test items into three taxonomic levels according to the cognitive process required to answer the item.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classification, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
Katz, Irvin R.; And Others – 1993
This paper presents a technique for applying the Rule Space Model of cognitive diagnosis (Tatsuoka, 1983) to assessment in a semantically rich domain. Responses of 122 architects to 22 architecture test items developed to assess a range of architectural knowledge were analyzed using Rule Space. Verbal protocol analysis guided the construction of a…
Descriptors: Architects, Architecture, Classification, Cognitive Processes
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2