Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| African American Students | 2 |
| Cognitive Tests | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Racial Bias | 2 |
| Test Bias | 2 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Disproportionate… | 1 |
| Ethnic Groups | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| Hispanic American Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Larry P v Riles | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAston, Candice; Brown, Danice L. – Contemporary School Psychology, 2021
The Larry P. v. Riles case highlighted the disproportional representation of Black students in special education and called for the need of fair and nondiscriminatory psychological and educational evaluations. Despite the longstanding ban of the use of cognitive assessments with Black children in the state of California, Black children continue to…
Descriptors: African American Students, Student Evaluation, Psychological Evaluation, Court Litigation
Woods, Isaac L., Jr.; Niileksela, Christopher; Floyd, Randy G. – Contemporary School Psychology, 2021
Racial/ethnic bias in the prediction of students' educational potential was questioned in the Larry P. Vs. Riles case. The construct and predictive validity of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ IV; Schrank et al. 2014b) have not been examined for racial/ethnic bias. This study extended Keith's (1999) examination of bias…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Predictor Variables, Reading Achievement
