Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 50 |
Descriptor
College Administration | 376 |
Higher Education | 339 |
Administrator Role | 81 |
College Faculty | 63 |
Leadership | 56 |
Change Strategies | 50 |
Case Studies | 41 |
College Planning | 40 |
Organizational Change | 40 |
College Presidents | 37 |
Educational Finance | 35 |
More ▼ |
Source
New Directions for Higher… | 376 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 63 |
Postsecondary Education | 35 |
Two Year Colleges | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 121 |
Administrators | 111 |
Policymakers | 12 |
Teachers | 2 |
Location
California | 4 |
Florida | 3 |
Missouri | 3 |
Asia | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Indiana | 2 |
Iowa | 2 |
Massachusetts | 2 |
North Carolina | 2 |
South Carolina | 2 |
Virginia | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Tax Reform Act 1986 | 8 |
Proposition 13 (California… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ward, James Dean; Haynes, Mya – New Directions for Higher Education, 2022
This chapter presents findings from eight interviews with college and university chief financial officers about institutional borrowing practices during periods of uncertainty and crisis.
Descriptors: College Administration, Administrator Attitudes, Educational Finance, Decision Making
Dorantes, Andrew R.; Schiffecker, Sarah Maria; García, Hugo A. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2022
In this chapter, the experiences of mid-level business and finance staff positions in private colleges are explored to illuminate how they engage the campus environment as they help navigate their institutional fiscal vitality through the lens of empowerment theory. Through qualitative interviewers, findings include how they negotiate shared…
Descriptors: Middle Management, College Administration, Private Colleges, College Environment
Lee, Karen A. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2022
This chapter presents the perspective of a provost on public intellectuals in higher education. It provides practical guidance through a series of questions faculty members might ask themselves about their role and approach to public intellectualism, including how to translate academic scholarship into a legible message for the general public and…
Descriptors: College Administration, Administrator Attitudes, Intellectual Experience, College Faculty
Dorantes, Andrew R.; Peterson, Joel L. A. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2020
This chapter examines the impact and success of mid-level business and finance staff at private colleges or universities, using an adaptation of Bronfenbrenner's multilevel social integration model. This chapter also highlights the voices of mid-level business and finance staff and describes the experiences, successes, and challenges they have…
Descriptors: College Administration, Private Colleges, Middle Management, Administrator Attitudes
Taylor, Leonard, Jr. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2022
Higher education institutions and the actors therein are still grappling with disparities in student outcomes and disparate student experiences. Although diligent efforts have been made, institutions have yet to transform in any substantial way to overcome these issues. Rather than offering new student success practices, the focus of this chapter…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Achievement Gap, Outcomes of Education, Educational Change
Playing the Long Game: Surviving Fads and Creating Lasting Student Success through Academic Advising
Thomas, Carolyn; McFarlane, Brett – New Directions for Higher Education, 2018
This chapter focuses on institution-wide administration of advising and student success initiatives that address the complexity of higher education. The authors stress the importance of "staying the course" set by campus leadership (or setting a visionary agenda) while being responsible to stakeholders.
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Advising, Higher Education, College Students
Hazelkorn, Ellen – New Directions for Higher Education, 2014
This chapter delves into the growing influence and impact of rankings on higher education, as a lens through which to view how the race for reputation and status is changing the higher education landscape, both globally and nationally. The author considers the extent to which rankings are driving policy choices and institutional decisions and the…
Descriptors: Global Approach, Reputation, Higher Education, Classification
Neumann, Anna; Bolitzer, Liza – New Directions for Higher Education, 2014
Learning is a core part of all forms of higher education work. College leaders of all kinds--administrators, staff, faculty, and students--must know how to seek out and support the wide array of learning that can go on in colleges and universities.
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Administration, Educational Improvement, Higher Education
Martinez, Magdalena – New Directions for Higher Education, 2015
There is limited research on how postsecondary institutions prepare to become HSIs. This chapter examines organizational change through a group of emerging HSIs and their governance, policy, and leadership.
Descriptors: Organizational Change, Hispanic American Students, Institutional Characteristics, Postsecondary Education
Kalsbeek, David H. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2013
At every college and university, students enroll with expectations and aspirations about the kind of experience and the kind of outcomes that the institution delivers. When those expectations are met and exceeded, students are satisfied and likely to remain committed to their college choice. When their experience falls short of their expectations,…
Descriptors: School Holding Power, College Administration, Student Recruitment, Undergraduate Students
Kalsbeek, David H.; Zucker, Brian – New Directions for Higher Education, 2013
Over 35 years of retention theory and literature have acknowledged the importance of institutional and student profiles in accounting for cross-sectional differences in retention and completion rates between types of colleges and universities. The first "P" within a 4 Ps framework of student retention--"profile"--recognizes that an institution's…
Descriptors: School Holding Power, Graduation Rate, College Administration, Undergraduate Students
Kalsbeek, David H. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2013
A 4 Ps framework for student retention strategy is a construct for reframing the retention discussion in a way that enables institutional improvement by challenging some conventional wisdom and prevailing perspectives that have characterized retention strategy for years. It opens new possibilities for action and improvement by suggesting that…
Descriptors: School Holding Power, Graduation Rate, Models, College Administration
Schroeder, Charles C. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2013
When institutions engage in discussions regarding improving retention and graduation rates, invariably the conversation focuses on entering student characteristics, especially ACT and SAT scores and high school grades. Clearly, attracting and enrolling well-prepared and motivated high-ability students will certainly improve institutional measures…
Descriptors: School Holding Power, Graduation Rate, College Administration, Methods
Bray, Nathaniel J.; Braxton, John M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2012
Codes of conduct can and should fulfill a critical role in higher education. Codes help overcome some of the challenges inherent in a system predicated on high levels of autonomy and on self-regulation. Codes not only are important indicators of critical topics that are deemed worthy of explicit protection or expectations for behavior; they may…
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, Higher Education, College Administration, College Faculty
Schroeder, Charles C. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2013
Focusing on the student experience broadly defined and, in particular, on the quality of student encounters in and out of the classroom is of critical importance to improving student outcomes. Improving learning, satisfaction, retention, time to degree, and graduation outcomes is not predicated simply on improving entering characteristics or…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Experience, Outcomes of Education, College Administration