Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Benchmarking | 2 |
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Grammar | 2 |
| Writing Assignments | 2 |
| Academic Discourse | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Doctoral Programs | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cassi L. Liardet | 1 |
| Henry, Patricia | 1 |
| Miller, James | 1 |
| Sharyn Black | 1 |
| Shaw, Melanie | 1 |
| Vinella, Michael | 1 |
| Walters, Kelley Jo | 1 |
| Wells, Steve | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCassi L. Liardet; Sharyn Black – Teaching in Higher Education, 2025
One of the most significant and yet often overlooked challenges for university students is decoding what their instructors expect from their assignments. Better understanding those expectations and the vocabulary and grammar needed to achieve them are the motivations behind this investigation. Eleven experienced instructors within an Australian…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Writing Teachers, Writing Assignments, Writing Evaluation
Walters, Kelley Jo; Henry, Patricia; Vinella, Michael; Wells, Steve; Shaw, Melanie; Miller, James – International Journal on E-Learning, 2015
Providing transparent written feedback to doctoral students is essential to the learning process and preparation for the capstone. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative exploration of faculty feedback on benchmark written assignments across multiple, online doctoral programs. The Corpus for this analysis included 236 doctoral…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Feedback (Response), Graduate Students, College Faculty
