Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Friendship | 1 |
| Health Behavior | 1 |
| Health Promotion | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Individual Development | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment | 2 |
Author
| King, Keith A. | 1 |
| Murray, Karen A. | 1 |
| Patton, Jon M. | 1 |
| Piedmont, Ralph L. | 1 |
| Ward, Rose Marie | 1 |
| Zullig, Keith J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| NEO Personality Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkZullig, Keith J.; Ward, Rose Marie; King, Keith A.; Patton, Jon M.; Murray, Karen A. – Assessment, 2009
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the reliability and validity of eight developmental asset measures among a stratified, random sample (N = 540) of college students to guide health promotion efforts. The sample was randomly split to produce exploratory and confirmatory samples for factor analysis using principal axis factoring and…
Descriptors: College Students, Health Promotion, Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedPiedmont, Ralph L. – Assessment, 1994
Reliability and construct validity of observer ratings on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) were evaluated in a sample of 101 college students and the observations of 2 people who knew each student. Results document the strong internal consistency of each scale and a factor structure replicating previous findings. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Friendship, Higher Education, Individual Development
