NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ryan D. Kopatich; Joseph P. Magliano; Keith K. Millis; Christopher P. Parker; Melissa Ray – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2019
A large body of work has demonstrated that reader resources influence inference processes and comprehension, but few models of comprehension have accounted for such resources. The Direct and Mediational Inference model of comprehension (DIME) assumes that general inference processes mediate the effects of reader resources on general comprehension…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Intelligence Tests, Inferences, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McCrudden, Matthew T.; Magliano, Joseph P.; Schraw, Gregory – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
This work examined how adjunct displays influence college readers' moment-by-moment processing of text and the products of reading, using reading time (Experiments 1 & 2), and think-aloud methodologies (Experiment 3). Participants did or did not study a diagram before reading a text. Overall, the reading time data, think-aloud data, and recall…
Descriptors: Electronic Publishing, Reading Processes, Reader Text Relationship, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braasch, Jason L. G.; Goldman, Susan R. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Two experiments examined whether inconsistent effects of analogies in promoting new content learning from text are related to prior knowledge of the analogy "per se." In Experiment 1, college students who demonstrated little understanding of weather systems and different levels of prior knowledge (more vs. less) of an analogous everyday…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Prior Learning, Misconceptions, Protocol Analysis