Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 8 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 35 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 58 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 70 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 73 |
| College Students | 73 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 73 |
| Foreign Countries | 44 |
| Student Attitudes | 35 |
| COVID-19 | 23 |
| Pandemics | 23 |
| Electronic Learning | 19 |
| Online Courses | 19 |
| Integrity | 18 |
| Supervision | 18 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Ashford, Cliff | 2 |
| Awdry, Rebecca | 2 |
| Bryant, Mike | 2 |
| Chung, Jennifer | 2 |
| Henderson, Michael | 2 |
| Maurer, Karsten | 2 |
| Mundy, Matthew | 2 |
| Peytcheva-Forsyth, Roumiana | 2 |
| Ryan, Kris | 2 |
| Abood, Harith | 1 |
| Abu Maizer, Maha | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 72 |
| Postsecondary Education | 65 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 7 |
| South Africa | 5 |
| Turkey | 4 |
| Bulgaria | 3 |
| Netherlands | 3 |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 |
| Finland | 2 |
| Germany | 2 |
| Iran | 2 |
| Jordan | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Henderson, Michael; Chung, Jennifer; Awdry, Rebecca; Ashford, Cliff; Bryant, Mike; Mundy, Matthew; Ryan, Kris – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2023
Discussions around assessment integrity often focus on the exam conditions and the motivations and values of those who cheated in comparison with those who did not. We argue that discourse needs to move away from a binary representation of cheating. Instead, we propose that the conversation may be more productive and more impactful by focusing on…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Ambiguity (Semantics)
Mohamed Kara-Mohamed – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2025
(1) Context: The growing accessibility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, such as ChatGPT, poses a challenge to the integrity of online assessments in higher education. As AI becomes more integrated into academic contexts, educators face the complex task of maintaining assessment standards particularly within modern Virtual Learning…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Classrooms, Computer Assisted Testing, Universities
Tiana P. Johnson-Clements; Guy J. Curtis; Joseph Clare – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
Concerns over students engaging in various forms of academic misconduct persist, especially with the post-COVID-19 rise in online learning and assessment. Research has demonstrated a clear role of the personality trait psychopathy in cheating, yet little is known about why this relationship exists. Building on the research by Curtis et al.…
Descriptors: Pandemics, COVID-19, Cheating, Electronic Learning
Cleophas, Catherine; Hönnige, Christoph; Meisel, Frank; Meyer, Philipp – INFORMS Transactions on Education, 2023
As the COVID-19 pandemic motivated a shift to virtual teaching, exams have increasingly moved online too. Detecting cheating through collusion is not easy when tech-savvy students take online exams at home and on their own devices. Such online at-home exams may tempt students to collude and share materials and answers. However, online exams'…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Identification, Essay Tests
Meljun Barnayha; Gamaliel Gonzales; Rachel Lavador; Jessamae Martel; Ma. Kathleen Urot; Roselyn Gonzales – Psychology in the Schools, 2025
This study examines the determinants of online academic dishonesty using the theory of planned behavior. We surveyed 1087 college students in Central Philippines and utilized a partial least squares-structural equation modeling analysis to evaluate a proposed model. Results demonstrate that 10 of the 11 hypothesized relationships are statistically…
Descriptors: Self Control, Cheating, Intervention, Ethics
Alireza Maleki – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
Although existing research has explored various aspects of online exam cheating, there is a scarcity of studies with in-depth qualitative phases focusing specifically on psychological reasons for online exam cheating in higher education context. Therefore, the aim of this mixed-methods research is to investigate the psychological reasons behind…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, College Students
Andrea E. Green – ProQuest LLC, 2024
No solution can ultimately eliminate cheating in online courses. However, universities reserve funding for authentication systems to minimize the threat of cheating in online courses. Most higher education institutions use a combination of authentication methods to secure systems against impersonation attacks during online examinations.…
Descriptors: College Students, Cheating, Online Courses, Intervention
Philip M. Newton; Keioni Essex – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Academic misconduct is a threat to the validity and reliability of online examinations, and media reports suggest that misconduct spiked dramatically in higher education during the emergency shift to online exams caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reviewed survey research to determine how common it is for university students to admit…
Descriptors: Cheating, Tests, Electronic Learning, COVID-19
Hoa Duong Quang; Hieu Ha Van; Khang Do Ba; Quy Nguyen Huu; Thang Phan Vo Minh; Loc Pham Quoc – Journal of Educators Online, 2025
During COVID-19 lockdowns, Vietnamese universities, like elsewhere, were compelled by social distancing rules to transition from on-site to online education, including examinations. However, many of these universities were not prepared for such sudden and drastic changes. This situation raises questions about if and how the students' cheating…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Student Behavior
Conijn, Rianne; Kleingeld, Ad; Matzat, Uwe; Snijders, Chris – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022
Background: Online and blended learning need an appropriate assessment strategy which ensures academic integrity. During the pandemic, many universities have chosen for online proctoring. Although some earlier examples suggest that online proctoring may reduce cheating, the potential side-effects of proctoring are largely unknown. Objectives:…
Descriptors: Supervision, Computer Assisted Testing, Integrity, Cheating
Colette Melissa Kell; Yasmeen Thandar; Adelle Kemlall Bhundoo; Firoza Haffejee; Bongiwe Mbhele; Jennifer Ducray – Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2025
Purpose: Academic integrity is vital to the success and sustainability of the academic project and particularly critical in the training of ethical and informed health professionals. Yet studies have found that cheating in online exams was commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the increased use of online and blended learning…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Integrity, Cheating
Liandi van den Berg – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2025
Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) and the sudden shift to online learning, higher education institutions adopted various approaches to reduce cheating in online assessments, mainly involving online live proctoring (OLP). The international assessment integrity regulation trend also applied to a university in South Africa, where…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Faculty, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
Oeding, Jill M. – Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2022
One of the primary findings from this study is the importance of watching the exam proctoring videos for online, remotely proctored exams. Proctors do not need to be experts in academic dishonesty to detect the misconduct. The key to detecting academic dishonesty is to closely monitor the examinee's eyes, know the eyes' position when the examinee…
Descriptors: Prevention, Identification, Cheating, Ethics
Necati Taskin; Mehmet Kokoç – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
This study examines the growing issue of academic dishonesty in online assessments, a challenge intensified by the expansion of digital learning platforms. Specifically, it investigates the relationship between students' online engagement and their performance in online versus traditional paper-and-pencil tests. Employing a cross-sectional…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Computer Assisted Testing, Technology Uses in Education
Monahan, Michael; Shah, Amit – Research in Higher Education Journal, 2023
Academic dishonesty is a major issue in education. Perhaps more so in the online environment where may times students are on their honor to complete exams without the use of the Internet, notes, or other prohibited materials. The age range of 18-24 encompasses the traditional aged student body. The non-traditional students are over the age of 25…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, College Students, Nontraditional Students

Peer reviewed
Direct link
