NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grainger, Jonathan; Beyersmann, Elisabeth – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Two masked priming experiments investigated the impact of prime lexicality (word vs. nonword) and the pseudo-morphological structure of prime stimuli (pseudosuffixed vs. nonsuffixed) on embedded word priming effects. In the related prime conditions, target words were embedded at the beginning of prime stimuli and were followed either by a…
Descriptors: Morphology (Languages), Morphemes, Priming, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bronkema, Ryan – College Teaching, 2018
As educators, we've all probably experienced presenting in new places and/or audiences, and having some sort of mishap. Therefore, as part of their professional preparation, we should prepare our students with realistic presentation practice, mishaps and all! Within this paper, I will outline a pedagogical tool that randomizes potential…
Descriptors: Public Speaking, Student Projects, Skill Development, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Tsubaki, Michiko; Ogawara, Wataru; Tanaka, Kenta – International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2020
This study proposes and examines an analytical method with the aim of improving the quality of education and learning by situating the answers to full descriptive questions in probability and statistics to make variables of learners' comprehension of learned content as answer characteristics, based on actual student mistakes. First, we proposed…
Descriptors: Probability, Statistics, Comprehension, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sundermann, Michael J. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2008
A statistical analysis of multiple-choice answers is performed to identify anomalies that can be used as evidence of student cheating. The ratio of exact errors in common (EEIC: two students put the same wrong answer for a question) to differences (D: two students get different answers) was found to be a good indicator of cheating under a wide…
Descriptors: College Students, Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Statistical Analysis