Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
College Students | 5 |
Evaluation Methods | 5 |
Written Language | 5 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
English (Second Language) | 2 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
Oral Language | 2 |
Second Language Instruction | 2 |
Student Evaluation | 2 |
Writing Instruction | 2 |
Writing Skills | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Journal of Further and Higher… | 1 |
Journal of Language and… | 1 |
Research & Practice in… | 1 |
Shanlax International Journal… | 1 |
Author
Beer, Colin | 1 |
Bridges, Bill | 1 |
Eginli, Ilknur | 1 |
Hult, Hakan | 1 |
Lawson, Celeste | 1 |
Nardone, Carroll F. | 1 |
Roberts, Jeff | 1 |
Roy, Sherre | 1 |
Scheja, Max | 1 |
Soderberg, Magnus | 1 |
Solhi, Mehdi | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yang Yang – Shanlax International Journal of Education, 2024
This paper explores the reliability of using ChatGPT in evaluating EFL writing by assessing its intra- and inter-rater reliability. Eighty-two compositions were randomly sampled from the Written English Corpus of Chinese Learners. These compositions were rated by three experienced raters with regard to 'language', 'content', and 'organization'.…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Writing (Composition), Evaluation Methods
Roy, Sherre; Beer, Colin; Lawson, Celeste – Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2020
Much of the contemporary literature around assessment practices in higher education focuses on assessment quality and its fitness for purpose. However, there is limited research around student comprehension of written assessment task descriptions and their understanding of the task itself. The purpose of this study was to examine a number of…
Descriptors: Readability, Written Language, Student Evaluation, College Students
Solhi, Mehdi; Eginli, Ilknur – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2020
While there is general agreement among learners, teachers, and scholars that constructive feedback on writing is necessary to revision, there are fewer consensuses on how feedback should be given, when, by whom, and what sort of feedback is most effective (Weigle, 2014). Providing feedback on writing is generally categorized into three types:…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Feedback (Response), Oral Language
Roberts, Jeff; Nardone, Carroll F.; Bridges, Bill – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2017
Written communication remains an important learning objective for colleges and universities as more and more students enter the workforce without necessary writing skills and experiences. This importance is increased for public colleges and universities within the state of Texas, as that state has adopted written communication as a core learning…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Racial Differences, Ethnicity, Gender Differences
Weurlander, Maria; Soderberg, Magnus; Scheja, Max; Hult, Hakan; Wernerson, Annika – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
This study aims to provide a greater insight into how formative assessments are experienced and understood by students. Two different formative assessment methods, an individual, written assessment and an oral group assessment, were components of a pathology course within a medical curriculum. In a cohort of 70 students, written accounts were…
Descriptors: Medical Students, Formative Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Student Attitudes