Descriptor
Source
Campus Activities Programming | 9 |
Author
Anderson, Janet E. | 1 |
Farrell, Karla | 1 |
Forney, Dea | 1 |
Hall, Mark | 1 |
Johnson, Lana | 1 |
Knofla, Tracy | 1 |
Miner, Stephen | 1 |
Nolfi, Tricia | 1 |
Schneeweiss, Robert | 1 |
Silverstein, Liz | 1 |
Triplett, Beth | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 5 |
Practitioners | 5 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schneeweiss, Robert – Campus Activities Programming, 1989
Much of a group's development is part of the natural, interpersonal dynamics that exist when people are working together. Stages in the developmental cycle of groups are identified: polite, why we're here, bid for power, constructive, and esprit de corps. (MLW)
Descriptors: Committees, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interpersonal Communication
Silverstein, Liz – Campus Activities Programming, 1989
Changing demographics on college campuses have called for corresponding changes and re-evaluations in campus activities programing. Program boards increasingly find themselves dealing with "alternative" programing. Some ideas for programing are presented. (MLW)
Descriptors: Committees, Cultural Activities, Extracurricular Activities, Higher Education
Miner, Stephen – Campus Activities Programming, 1989
Four or five events together constitute a lively arts 'series'. Ways to make a college series a success are discussed, covering: goal setting, the talent, and promotion. The usual series range from four to six performances and allows a season ticket holder to experience varied selections of performing arts attraction. (MLW)
Descriptors: Committees, Concerts, Cultural Activities, Extracurricular Activities
Nolfi, Tricia; Forney, Dea – Campus Activities Programming, 1993
The use of focus groups to assess existing college student leadership efforts and as a step in developing better programs is examined. Procedures include assembling a planning team, identifying information needs, determining the composition of focus groups, soliciting and training volunteers, and using focus group results to design a program. (MSE)
Descriptors: Committees, Extracurricular Activities, Faculty Advisers, Group Membership
Johnson, Lana – Campus Activities Programming, 1986
Variety, academic compatibility, and class are the components of a winning lecture program. An award-winning program at Southern Utah State College, along with its rules and general operations, are described. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administration, College Environment, College Faculty, Committees
Knofla, Tracy – Campus Activities Programming, 1994
Ways in which to revive and promote creativity in campus activities programming are offered. Specific steps to take, particularly in committee meetings, to energize individual thinking and group processes and to improve programming and publicity are detailed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Brainstorming, Committees, Creative Activities, Creative Development
Hall, Mark – Campus Activities Programming, 1992
A discussion of successful leadership in meetings looks at differing philosophies about the role of the group leader, the different roles assumed by group members, minimal responsibilities that the leader must fulfill, and specific suggestions for maintaining the group's interest during the meeting. (MSE)
Descriptors: Committees, Efficiency, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Triplett, Beth – Campus Activities Programming, 1991
Notes on planning for successful parent and family weekend programs at colleges and universities include discussion of the event's purpose, scheduling, use of a planning committee, funding, effective promotion, attention to program detail, tailoring programs to subgroups and target populations, event ideas, and family involvement in other campus…
Descriptors: Committees, Extracurricular Activities, Family Programs, Financial Support
Farrell, Karla; Anderson, Janet E. – Campus Activities Programming, 1993
College compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 requires that sensitivity to the needs of all students be a high priority for student activities programming. This includes attention to office accessibility, balanced representation on program boards, sensitivity training, accessibility of activities, and publicity designed to…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Accessibility (for Disabled), College Environment, College Students