NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Bialeschki, M. Deborah – Parks and Recreation, 1994
Drastic changes in and elimination of park, recreation, and leisure services curricula have occurred in higher education. Practitioners and educators can help promote the future of campus and community programs. The paper explains how to create the necessary image to keep such programs workable, noting important keys to program success. (SM)
Descriptors: Athletics, Community Recreation Programs, Community Resources, Curriculum Development
Holmwood, Joseph H. – Parks and Recreation, 1980
The park and recreation department of Kettering, Ohio has begun to promote volunteerism both as a way to involve citizens and as an effective way to make money. Benefits include positive attitudes toward programs, cost reductions, and the availability of persons with special, unique skills. (JN)
Descriptors: Citizen Participation, Community Action, Community Involvement, Community Recreation Programs
Austin, David R.; Powell, Lou G. – Parks and Recreation, 1981
Project INSPIRE (Indiana Special Population Institutes for Recreation Educators), assisted by a team of 61 experts, identified 16 minimum competencies necessary for entry-level professionals in the field of recreation to serve special populations in community recreation. (JN)
Descriptors: Community Recreation Programs, Community Resources, Disabilities, Inservice Education
Lopez, Stephen – Parks and Recreation, 1983
When community groups assume stewardship of underused properties and turn them into recreational spaces, park agencies can save money on overhead and construction. Three stewardship projects in New York State, involving a playing field, gardening areas, and a historical restoration, are described. Criteria for successful projects are included. (PP)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Community Action, Community Involvement, Community Recreation Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barkanov, S. – Russian Education and Society, 1995
Presents a concise overview of the summer youth recreation programs and facilities in Russia. Lack of funding represents a problem as does the decline of trade union support. Some private entrepreneurial camps have turned their facilities over to the government. Includes brief descriptions of types of programs and the number of youth served. (MJP)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Community Recreation Programs, Community Resources, Economic Impact