Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Uses in Education | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Research Needs | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Tables (Data) | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computers in Human Behavior | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Strong Campbell Interest… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedVansickle, Timothy R.; Kapes, Jerome T. – Computers in Human Behavior, 1993
Describes a study of undergraduates that was conducted to examine the equivalence of the mode of administration using the paper-pencil and computer-based versions of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. Differences in scores are discussed, time taken for the inventories is studied, and further research is suggested. (Contains 16 references.)…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Correlation, Higher Education
Vansickle, Timothy R.; Kapes, Jerome T. – 1988
First-, second-, and third-year students enrolled in an introductory educational psychology class at Texas A&M University in College Station were administered either a pencil-and-paper or computerized version of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. The same or other version of the test was administered after 2 weeks. Focus is on equivalence…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Uses in Education
