Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 4 |
Performance Factors | 4 |
Intelligence Tests | 3 |
Adults | 2 |
Age Differences | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
Older Adults | 2 |
Ability Identification | 1 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Adolescents | 1 |
Blacks | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Cuevas, Lara | 1 |
Escorial, Sergio | 1 |
Garcia, Luis F. | 1 |
Juan-Espinosa, Manuel | 1 |
Looft, William R. | 1 |
Storandt, Martha | 1 |
Terrell, Francis | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Spain | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 4 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Looft, William R. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Adults, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Intelligence Tests
Juan-Espinosa, Manuel; Cuevas, Lara; Escorial, Sergio; Garcia, Luis F. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2006
The general ("g") factor is the most general and relevant cognitive ability. This factor is considered to be one of the most important predictors of academic achievement and of many other socially relevant behavioral outcomes. In the last decades, many researchers have investigated the possible changes in the relevance of the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cognitive Ability, Performance Factors, Predictor Variables

Terrell, Francis; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981
Identified groups with high and low levels of mistrust of Whites. Half of the participants in each group were then administered the WAIS by a white examiner. The remaining were tested by a Black examiner. The Black examiner-high mistrust group scored significantly higher than the White examiner-high mistrust group. (Author)
Descriptors: Blacks, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Examiners

Storandt, Martha – Journal of Gerontology, 1977
Timed and untimed scoring methods were employed with five WAIS subtests administered to 40 young and 40 old subjects matched for verbal intelligence. Elimination of bonuses for rapid performance differentially improved the scores of older subjects but did not raise those scores to levels achieved by the young. (Author)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Age Differences, Comparative Analysis, Gerontology