Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 4 |
Structural Equation Models | 4 |
Sample Size | 2 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Causal Models | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
Etiology | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Child Development | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
Multivariate Behavioral… | 1 |
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 1 |
Author
Coffman, Donna L. | 1 |
Epstein, David | 1 |
Goodman, Joshua T. | 1 |
Hernandez, Adolfo | 1 |
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto | 1 |
McArdle, J. J. | 1 |
Willse, John T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 4 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Coffman, Donna L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Mediation is usually assessed by a regression-based or structural equation modeling (SEM) approach that we refer to as the classical approach. This approach relies on the assumption that there are no confounders that influence both the mediator, "M", and the outcome, "Y". This assumption holds if individuals are randomly…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Regression (Statistics), Probability
Willse, John T.; Goodman, Joshua T. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
This research provides a direct comparison of effect size estimates based on structural equation modeling (SEM), item response theory (IRT), and raw scores. Differences between the SEM, IRT, and raw score approaches are examined under a variety of data conditions (IRT models underlying the data, test lengths, magnitude of group differences, and…
Descriptors: Test Length, Structural Equation Models, Effect Size, Raw Scores
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Hernandez, Adolfo – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
The interpretation of a Thurstonian model for paired comparisons where the utilities' covariance matrix is unrestricted proved to be difficult due to the comparative nature of the data. We show that under a suitable constraint the utilities' correlation matrix can be estimated, yielding a readily interpretable solution. This set of identification…
Descriptors: Identification, Structural Equation Models, Matrices, Comparative Analysis

McArdle, J. J.; Epstein, David – Child Development, 1987
Uses structural equation modeling to combine traditional ideas from repeated-measures ANOVA with some traditional ideas from longitudinal factor analysis. The model describes a latent growth curve model that permits the estimation of parameters representing individual and group dynamics. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Children, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis