Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 11 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 11 |
Individual Testing | 11 |
Group Testing | 7 |
Student Evaluation | 4 |
Cooperative Learning | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Teaching Methods | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 2 |
Biology | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
New York | 1 |
South Africa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wiskow, Katie M.; Donaldson, Jeanne M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2016
We compared the effects of Lag 0 and Lag 1 schedules of reinforcement on children's responses naming category items in a group context and subsequent responses emitted during individual testing in which the schedule of reinforcement remained Lag 0. Specifically, we measured response variability and novel responses to categories for 3 children who…
Descriptors: Naming, Children, Reinforcement, Context Effect
Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Klingbeil, Dave A.; Parker, David C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2017
Although extensive research exists on the use of curriculum-based measures for progress monitoring, little is known about using computer adaptive tests (CATs) for progress-monitoring purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the frequency of data collection on individual and group growth estimates using a CAT. Data were…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Data Collection, Scheduling
Bay, Darlene; Pacharn, Parunchana – Accounting Education, 2017
Cooperative learning techniques have been found to be quite successful in a variety of learning environments. However, in university-level accounting courses, investigations of the efficacy of cooperative learning pedagogical methods have produced mixed results at best. To continue the search for a cooperative learning method that is effective in…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Testing, Accounting, Advanced Courses
McCall, Megan O'Neill – ProQuest LLC, 2017
This study examined the effects of cooperative testing versus traditional or individual testing and the impacts on academic achievement, motivation toward science, and study time for 9th grade biology students. Research questions centered on weekly quizzes given in a flipped classroom format for a period of 13 weeks. The study used a mixed methods…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Group Testing, Academic Achievement, Learning Motivation
Berg, Ronan M. G.; Plovsing, Ronni R.; Damgaard, Morten – Advances in Physiology Education, 2012
Quiz-based and collaborative teaching strategies have previously been found to be efficient for the improving meaningful learning of physiology during lectures. These approaches have, however, not been investigated during laboratory exercises. In the present study, we compared the impact of solving quizzes individually and in groups with…
Descriptors: Medical Students, College Students, Intervention, Student Evaluation
Freund, Philipp Alexander; Holling, Heinz – Intelligence, 2011
The interpretation of retest scores is problematic because they are potentially affected by measurement and predictive bias, which impact construct validity, and because their size differs as a function of various factors. This paper investigates the construct stability of scores on a figural matrices test and models retest effects at the level of…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Test Results, Individual Testing, Construct Validity
Scafe, Marla G. – American Journal of Business Education, 2011
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of group testing as a pedagogical technique to enhance learning in a difficult subject such as statistics. Individual test scores were compared to their group test scores for the same, identical test. A t test was used to compare the scores for 157 randomly selected MBA students enrolled…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Testing, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Leight, Hayley; Saunders, Cheston; Calkins, Robin; Withers, Michelle – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2012
Collaborative testing has been shown to improve performance but not always content retention. In this study, we investigated whether collaborative testing could improve both performance and content retention in a large, introductory biology course. Students were semirandomly divided into two groups based on their performances on exam 1. Each group…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Biology, Scoring, Group Testing
Hahn, Jan Hendrik; Mentz, Elsa; Meyer, Lukas – Journal of Information Technology Education, 2009
Although pair programming has proved its usefulness in teaching and learning programming skills, it is difficult to assess the individual roles and abilities of students whilst programming in pairs. (Note that within this manuscript, the term assessment refers to evaluating individual student performance.) Assessing only the outcomes of a pair…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Individual Testing, Academic Standards
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2008
"Naturalization Test Redesign Project: Civics Item Selection Analysis" provides an overview of the development of content items for the U.S. history and government (civics) portion of the redesigned naturalization test. This document also reviews the process used to gather and analyze data from multiple studies to determine which civics…
Descriptors: History, Test Items, Citizenship, Individual Testing
Desrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing