NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive15
Journal Articles14
Collected Works - Serial1
Education Level
Higher Education2
Audience
Researchers1
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Survey of Student…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Merkle, Edgar C.; Fitzsimmons, Ellen; Uanhoro, James; Goodrich, Ben – Grantee Submission, 2021
Structural equation models comprise a large class of popular statistical models, including factor analysis models, certain mixed models, and extensions thereof. Model estimation is complicated by the fact that we typically have multiple interdependent response variables and multiple latent variables (which may also be called random effects or…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Psychometrics, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ockey, Gary J.; Choi, Ikkyu – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2015
Studies that use structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques are increasingly encountered in the language assessment literature. This popularity has created the need for a set of guidelines that can indicate what should be included in a research report and make it possible for research consumers to judge the appropriateness of the…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Structural Equation Models, Language Tests, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Libo; Bentler, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2011
MacCallum, Browne, and Cai (2006) proposed a new framework for evaluation and power analysis of small differences between nested structural equation models (SEMs). In their framework, the null and alternative hypotheses for testing a small difference in fit and its related power analyses were defined by some chosen root-mean-square error of…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de la Torre, Jimmy – Psychometrika, 2011
The G-DINA ("generalized deterministic inputs, noisy and gate") model is a generalization of the DINA model with more relaxed assumptions. In its saturated form, the G-DINA model is equivalent to other general models for cognitive diagnosis based on alternative link functions. When appropriate constraints are applied, several commonly used…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Identification, Models, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Macho, Siegfried; Ledermann, Thomas – Psychological Methods, 2011
The phantom model approach for estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects within structural equation models (SEMs) is presented. The rationale underlying this novel method consists in representing the specific effect to be assessed as a total effect within a separate latent variable model, the phantom model that is added to the main…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coffman, Donna L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Mediation is usually assessed by a regression-based or structural equation modeling (SEM) approach that we refer to as the classical approach. This approach relies on the assumption that there are no confounders that influence both the mediator, "M", and the outcome, "Y". This assumption holds if individuals are randomly…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Regression (Statistics), Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chow, Sy-Miin; Ho, Moon-ho R.; Hamaker, Ellen L.; Dolan, Conor V. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
State-space modeling techniques have been compared to structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques in various contexts but their unique strengths have often been overshadowed by their similarities to SEM. In this article, we provide a comprehensive discussion of these 2 approaches' similarities and differences through analytic comparisons and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Differences, Statistical Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Levy, Roy – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
SEMModComp, a software package for conducting likelihood ratio tests for mean and covariance structure modeling is described. The package is written in R and freely available for download or on request.
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Tests, Computer Software, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schweizer, Karl – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
The standardization of loadings gives a metric to the corresponding latent variable and thus scales the variance of this latent variable. By assigning an appropriately estimated weight to all the loadings on the same latent variable it can be achieved that the average squared loading is 1 as the result of standardization. As a consequence, there…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Short Term Memory, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Raykov, Tenko; Marcoulides, George A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Outlines a method for comparing completely standardized solutions in multiple groups. The method is based on a correlation structure analysis of equal-size samples and uses the correlation distribution theory implemented in the structural equation modeling program RAMONA. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Sample Size, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Byrne, Barbara M. – International Journal of Testing, 2001
Uses a confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) model as a paradigmatic basis for the comparison of three widely used structural equation modeling computer programs: (1) AMOS 4.0; (2) EQS 6; and (3) LISREL 8. Comparisons focus on aspects of programs that bear on the specification and testing of CFA models and the treatment of incomplete, nonnormally…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Data Analysis, Statistical Distributions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marsh, Herbert W.; Wen, Zhonglin; Hau, Kit-Tai – Psychological Methods, 2004
Interactions between (multiple indicator) latent variables are rarely used because of implementation complexity and competing strategies. Based on 4 simulation studies, the traditional constrained approach performed more poorly than did 3 new approaches-unconstrained, generalized appended product indicator, and quasi-maximum-likelihood (QML). The…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Item Analysis, Error Patterns, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Sik-Yum; Song, Xin-Yuan – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2001
Demonstrates the use of the well-known Bayes factor in the Bayesian literature for hypothesis testing and model comparison in general two-level structural equation models. Shows that the proposed method is flexible and can be applied to situations with a wide variety of nonnested models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Hypothesis Testing
Knight, William E. – Association for Institutional Research (NJ1), 2009
As more students enroll at community colleges, questions are raised about whether learning is the same in the two- and four-year sectors, both overall and for sub-groups, and whether effects of student backgrounds and college experiences on learning are similar. This study used structural equation modeling with CCSSE and NSSE data from a sample…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Academic Persistence, College Attendance, College Transfer Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Albert; Bockenholt, Ulf – Psychological Methods, 2005
L. L. Thurstone's (1927) model provides a powerful framework for modeling individual differences in choice behavior. An overview of Thurstonian models for comparative data is provided, including the classical Case V and Case III models as well as more general choice models with unrestricted and factor-analytic covariance structures. A flow chart…
Descriptors: Flow Charts, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Decision Making