Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Age Differences | 16 |
Comparative Analysis | 16 |
Cognitive Development | 9 |
Adults | 5 |
Children | 4 |
Classification | 4 |
Infants | 4 |
Performance Factors | 4 |
Cognitive Processes | 3 |
Preschool Children | 3 |
Task Analysis | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 16 |
Author
Arterberry, Martha E. | 1 |
Aslin, Richard N. | 1 |
Bloom, Paul | 1 |
Bornstein, Marc H. | 1 |
Call, Josep | 1 |
Carey, Susan | 1 |
Diesendruck, Gil | 1 |
Gelman, Susan A. | 1 |
Gelskov, Sofie V. | 1 |
Gentner, Dedre | 1 |
Goksun, Tilbe | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 16 |
Reports - Research | 15 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kalish, Charles W. – Cognition, 2010
Two experiments explored children's and adults' use of examples to make conditional predictions. In Experiment 1 adults (N = 20) but not 4-year-olds (N = 21) or 8-year-olds (N =1 8) distinguished predictable from unpredictable features when features were partially correlated (e.g., necessary but not sufficient). Children did make reliable…
Descriptors: Prediction, Memory, Correlation, Comparative Analysis
Goksun, Tilbe; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy; Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick; Imai, Mutsumi; Konishi, Haruka; Okada, Hiroyuki – Cognition, 2011
To learn relational terms such as verbs and prepositions, children must first dissect and process dynamic event components. This paper investigates the way in which 8- to 14-month-old English-reared infants notice the event components, "figure" (i.e., the moving entity) and "ground" (i.e., stationary setting), in both dynamic…
Descriptors: Infants, Old English, Investigations, Experiments
Hammer, Rubi; Diesendruck, Gil; Weinshall, Daphna; Hochstein, Shaul – Cognition, 2009
Category learning can be achieved by identifying common features among category members, distinctive features among non-members, or both. These processes are psychologically and computationally distinct, and may have implications for the acquisition of categories at different hierarchical levels. The present study examines an account of children's…
Descriptors: Learning Strategies, Young Children, Classification, Novels
Krachun, Carla; Call, Josep; Tomasello, Michael – Cognition, 2009
A milestone in human development is coming to recognize that how something looks is not necessarily how it is. We tested appearance-reality understanding in chimpanzees ("Pan troglodytes") with a task requiring them to choose between a small grape and a big grape. The apparent relative size of the grapes was reversed using magnifying and…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Animals, Primatology, Cognitive Ability
Gelskov, Sofie V.; Kouider, Sid – Cognition, 2010
The ability to detect and focus on faces is a fundamental prerequisite for developing social skills. But how well can infants detect faces? Here, we address this question by studying the minimum duration at which faces must appear to trigger a behavioral response in infants. We used a preferential looking method in conjunction with masking and…
Descriptors: Infants, Developmental Stages, Interpersonal Competence, Time Factors (Learning)
Ozcaliskan, Seyda; Goldin-Meadow, Susan; Gentner, Dedre; Mylander, Carolyn – Cognition, 2009
Commenting on perceptual similarities between objects stands out as an important linguistic achievement, one that may pave the way towards noticing and commenting on more abstract relational commonalities between objects. To explore whether having a conventional linguistic system is necessary for children to comment on different types of…
Descriptors: Speech, Linguistics, Sign Language, Oral Language

Halberda, Justin – Cognition, 2003
Two studies investigated young infants' use of the word-learning principle Mutual Exclusivity. Findings indicated that 17-month-olds used mutual exclusivity to map novel labels to novel objects in a preferential looking paradigm, whereas 16-month-olds performed at chance levels. Fourteen-month-olds systematically increased looking to the familiar…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Mapping, Cognitive Style, Comparative Analysis

Russell, James; Thompson, Doreen – Cognition, 2003
Examined event-based memory in three groups of children between ages 14 and 25 months. Found that search task success was general in oldest group while performance was similar on a task in which success "may" have been due to recalling an object-removal event and one in which success could "only" have been due to recall of…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis, Cross Sectional Studies

Swingley, Daniel; Aslin, Richard N. – Cognition, 2000
Examined the degree of specificity encoded in early lexical representations by presenting 18- to 23-month-olds with object labels either correctly or incorrectly pronounced and analyzing children's eye movement. Found that children recognized the spoken words in both conditions but recognition was poorer when words were mispronounced, with effects…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis, Encoding (Psychology)

Matan, Adee; Carey, Susan – Cognition, 2001
Three experiments examined the relative importance of original function and current function in artifact categorization for young children and adults. It was concluded that 6-year-olds have begun to organize their understanding of artifacts around the notion of original function, whereas 4-year-olds have not. Data were examined in terms of how…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Classification

Gelman, Susan A.; Bloom, Paul – Cognition, 2000
Examined how 3- and 5-year-olds and adults extend names for human-made artifacts. Found that even 3-year-olds were more likely to provide artifact names (e.g., "knife") when they believed objects were intentionally created and to provide material-based descriptions (e.g., "plastic") when they believed objects were accidentally…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis, Generalization

Arterberry, Martha E.; Bornstein, Marc H. – Cognition, 2002
Five experiments used a categorization habituation-of-looking paradigm to investigate infants' categorization of animals and vehicles based on static versus dynamic attributes of stimuli (color images versus dynamic point-light displays). Findings showed that 6-month-olds categorize animals and vehicles based on static and dynamic information, and…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis

Nation, Kate; Snowling, Margaret J. – Cognition, 1999
Assessed semantic priming for category coordinates and function-related words in children with good or poor reading comprehension, matched for decoding skill. Found that both groups showed priming for function-related words, but poor comprehenders showed priming for category coordinates only if the pairs shared high-association strength. Good…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Classification, Cognitive Development

Richards, Cassandra A.; Sanderson, Jennifer A. – Cognition, 1999
Tested whether 2- to 4-year olds could reason with incongruent syllogisms when encouraged to use their imagination. Randomly assigned 2-, 3-, and 4-year olds to one of four conditions (no cue, word cue, fantasy planet, or imagery) and presented syllogistic reasoning problems with incongruent information. Found that in imagination conditions, 2-…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis, Creative Thinking

Hermer, Linda; Spelke, Elizabeth – Cognition, 1996
Investigated the development of reorientation abilities in humans in contrast to other mammals. Findings support the domain specificity of human's core cognitive abilities, the conservation of cognitive abilities across related species and over the course of human development, and the developmental processes by which core abilities are extended to…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2