Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Language Patterns | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Language Research | 1 |
| Language Usage | 1 |
| Linguistic Theory | 1 |
| Neurolinguistics | 1 |
| Phrase Structure | 1 |
| Pragmatics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 1 |
Author
| Constable, R. Todd | 1 |
| Foster-Hanson, Emily | 1 |
| Lacadie, Cheryl | 1 |
| Negishi, Michiro | 1 |
| Piñango, Maria M. | 1 |
| Zhang, Muye | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPiñango, Maria M.; Zhang, Muye; Foster-Hanson, Emily; Negishi, Michiro; Lacadie, Cheryl; Constable, R. Todd – Cognitive Science, 2017
We examine metonymy at psycho- and neurolinguistic levels, seeking to adjudicate between two possible processing implementations (one- vs. two-mechanism). We compare highly conventionalized "systematic metonymy" (producer-for-product: "All freshmen read 'O'Connell'") to lesser-conventionalized "circumstantial…
Descriptors: Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistics, Language Processing, Comparative Analysis
