NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Asiret, Semih; Sünbül, Seçil Ömür – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2016
In this study, equating methods for random group design using small samples through factors such as sample size, difference in difficulty between forms, and guessing parameter was aimed for comparison. Moreover, which method gives better results under which conditions was also investigated. In this study, 5,000 dichotomous simulated data…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Sample Size, Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ozturk, Nagihan Boztunc; Dogan, Nuri – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2015
This study aims to investigate the effects of item exposure control methods on measurement precision and on test security under various item selection methods and item pool characteristics. In this study, the Randomesque (with item group sizes of 5 and 10), Sympson-Hetter, and Fade-Away methods were used as item exposure control methods. Moreover,…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Item Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kabasakal, Kübra Atalay; Kelecioglu, Hülya – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2015
This study examines the effect of differential item functioning (DIF) items on test equating through multilevel item response models (MIRMs) and traditional IRMs. The performances of three different equating models were investigated under 24 different simulation conditions, and the variables whose effects were examined included sample size, test…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Equated Scores, Item Response Theory, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Atalay Kabasakal, Kübra; Arsan, Nihan; Gök, Bilge; Kelecioglu, Hülya – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2014
This simulation study compared the performances (Type I error and power) of Mantel-Haenszel (MH), SIBTEST, and item response theory-likelihood ratio (IRT-LR) methods under certain conditions. Manipulated factors were sample size, ability differences between groups, test length, the percentage of differential item functioning (DIF), and underlying…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis, Test Bias