Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 8 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 10 |
Author
Alamri, Abeer A. | 1 |
Algina, James | 1 |
Aydin, Burak | 1 |
Bruno D. Zumbo | 1 |
Chris G. Richardson | 1 |
Devlieger, Ines | 1 |
Fu, Yuanshu | 1 |
Goodman, Joshua T. | 1 |
Hong, Sehee | 1 |
Hsiao, Yu-Yu | 1 |
James Ohisei Uanhoro | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Canada | 1 |
China | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
James Ohisei Uanhoro – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Accounting for model misspecification in Bayesian structural equation models is an active area of research. We present a uniquely Bayesian approach to misspecification that models the degree of misspecification as a parameter--a parameter akin to the correlation root mean squared residual. The misspecification parameter can be interpreted on its…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Statistical Inference
Fu, Yuanshu; Wen, Zhonglin; Wang, Yang – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Composite reliability, or coefficient omega, can be estimated using structural equation modeling. Composite reliability is usually estimated under the basic independent clusters model of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA). However, due to the existence of cross-loadings, the model fit of the exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Reliability
Thompson, Yutian T.; Song, Hairong; Shi, Dexin; Liu, Zhengkui – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2021
Conventional approaches for selecting a reference indicator (RI) could lead to misleading results in testing for measurement invariance (MI). Several newer quantitative methods have been available for more rigorous RI selection. However, it is still unknown how well these methods perform in terms of correctly identifying a truly invariant item to…
Descriptors: Measurement, Statistical Analysis, Selection, Comparative Analysis
Son, Sookyoung; Lee, Hyunjung; Jang, Yoona; Yang, Junyeong; Hong, Sehee – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2019
The purpose of the present study is to compare nonnormal distributions (i.e., t, skew-normal, skew-t with equal skew and skew-t with unequal skew) in growth mixture models (GMMs) based on diverse conditions of a number of time points, sample sizes, and skewness for intercepts. To carry out this research, two simulation studies were conducted with…
Descriptors: Statistical Distributions, Statistical Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Comparative Analysis
Sideridis, Georgios D.; Tsaousis, Ioannis; Alamri, Abeer A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
The main thesis of the present study is to use the Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) methodology of establishing approximate measurement invariance (A-MI) using data from a national examination in Saudi Arabia as an alternative to not meeting strong invariance criteria. Instead, we illustrate how to account for the absence of…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Foreign Countries, Error of Measurement
Hsiao, Yu-Yu; Kwok, Oi-Man; Lai, Mark H. C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2018
Path models with observed composites based on multiple items (e.g., mean or sum score of the items) are commonly used to test interaction effects. Under this practice, researchers generally assume that the observed composites are measured without errors. In this study, we reviewed and evaluated two alternative methods within the structural…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Testing, Scores, Models
Devlieger, Ines; Mayer, Axel; Rosseel, Yves – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
In this article, an overview is given of four methods to perform factor score regression (FSR), namely regression FSR, Bartlett FSR, the bias avoiding method of Skrondal and Laake, and the bias correcting method of Croon. The bias correcting method is extended to include a reliable standard error. The four methods are compared with each other and…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods
Aydin, Burak; Leite, Walter L.; Algina, James – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
We investigated methods of including covariates in two-level models for cluster randomized trials to increase power to detect the treatment effect. We compared multilevel models that included either an observed cluster mean or a latent cluster mean as a covariate, as well as the effect of including Level 1 deviation scores in the model. A Monte…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Predictor Variables, Randomized Controlled Trials, Experimental Groups
Willse, John T.; Goodman, Joshua T. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
This research provides a direct comparison of effect size estimates based on structural equation modeling (SEM), item response theory (IRT), and raw scores. Differences between the SEM, IRT, and raw score approaches are examined under a variety of data conditions (IRT models underlying the data, test lengths, magnitude of group differences, and…
Descriptors: Test Length, Structural Equation Models, Effect Size, Raw Scores
Chris G. Richardson; Pamela A. Ratner; Bruno D. Zumbo – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2007
The purpose of this investigation was to test the age-related measurement invariance and temporal stability of the 13-item version of Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC). Multigroup structural equation modeling of longitudinal data from the Canadian National Population Health Survey was used to examine the measurement invariance across 3…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Measures (Individuals), Structural Equation Models, Investigations