Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Sampling | 2 |
Benchmarking | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Cultural Differences | 1 |
Culture | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Identification | 1 |
Methods | 1 |
Research Methodology | 1 |
Robustness (Statistics) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Field Methods | 2 |
Author
Benedict, Noah | 1 |
Dengah, H. J. Francois, II | 1 |
Judith Glaesser | 1 |
Lacy, Michael G. | 1 |
Meyer, Mary C. | 1 |
Snodgrass, Jeffrey G. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
India | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Judith Glaesser – Field Methods, 2025
In qualitative comparative analysis, as with all methods, there is a question about how many cases are needed to make an analysis robust. In deciding on the number of cases, a key consideration is the number of conditions to be analyzed. I suggest that adding cases is preferable to dropping conditions if there are too many conditions relative to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Robustness (Statistics), Sampling, Case Studies
Lacy, Michael G.; Snodgrass, Jeffrey G.; Meyer, Mary C.; Dengah, H. J. Francois, II; Benedict, Noah – Field Methods, 2018
The most widely used formal approach to culture, the cultural consensus theory (CCT) of Romney, Weller, and Batchelder, originally relied on a priori definitions of cultural groups to map their unity and diversity. Retaining key features of classical CCT, we provide techniques to identify two or more cultural subgroups in a sample, whether those…
Descriptors: Culture, Subcultures, Cultural Differences, Theories