Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Visual Perception | 3 |
| Spatial Ability | 2 |
| Ability Grouping | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Arithmetic | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Attention Deficit… | 1 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Individual… | 3 |
Author
| Alloway, Tracy Packiam | 1 |
| Borella, Erika | 1 |
| De Beni, Rossana | 1 |
| Elsworth, Miquela | 1 |
| Gyselinck, Valerie | 1 |
| Landerl, Karin | 1 |
| Meneghetti, Chiara | 1 |
| Willburger, Edith | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMeneghetti, Chiara; Borella, Erika; Gyselinck, Valerie; De Beni, Rossana – Learning and Individual Differences, 2012
The aim of this research was to examine age-related differences in young and older adults in route learning, using different types of learning and recall test modalities. A sample of young adults (20-30 years old) and older adults (60-70 years old) learned a city route by using either a map or a description; they then performed a verification…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Age Differences, Young Adults, Sentences
Alloway, Tracy Packiam; Elsworth, Miquela – Learning and Individual Differences, 2012
The purpose of this study was to investigate the cognitive and behavioral profiles of high ability students. Performance on measures of verbal and visuo-spatial working memory and general ability (vocabulary and block design) was compared across the following groups: high, average, and low ability students. The behavioral profile of high ability…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Profiles, Children, Clinical Diagnosis
Landerl, Karin; Willburger, Edith – Learning and Individual Differences, 2010
In a large sample (N = 439) of literacy impaired and unimpaired elementary school children the predictions of the temporal processing theory of dyslexia were tested while controlling for (sub)clininal attentional deficits. Visual and Auditory Temporal Order Judgement were administered as well as three subtests of a standardized attention test. The…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Phonology, Dyslexia, Brain
