NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stuart, Elizabeth A.; Lalongo, Nicholas S. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010
This work examines ways to make the best use of limited resources when selecting individuals to follow up in a longitudinal study estimating causal effects. In the setting under consideration, covariate information is available for all individuals but outcomes have not yet been collected and may be expensive to gather, and thus only a subset of…
Descriptors: Selection, Followup Studies, Longitudinal Studies, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Rooij, Mark; Schouteden, Martijn – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
Maximum likelihood estimation of mixed effect baseline category logit models for multinomial longitudinal data can be prohibitive due to the integral dimension of the random effects distribution. We propose to use multidimensional unfolding methodology to reduce the dimensionality of the problem. As a by-product, readily interpretable graphical…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Longitudinal Studies, Data, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Castro-Schilo, Laura; Ferrer, Emilio – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2013
We illustrate the idiographic/nomothetic debate by comparing 3 approaches to using daily self-report data on affect for predicting relationship quality and breakup. The 3 approaches included (a) the first day in the series of daily data; (b) the mean and variability of the daily series; and (c) parameters from dynamic factor analysis, a…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Prediction, Group Behavior, Collectivism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Austin, Peter C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
Researchers are increasingly using observational or nonrandomized data to estimate causal treatment effects. Essential to the production of high-quality evidence is the ability to reduce or minimize the confounding that frequently occurs in observational studies. When using the potential outcome framework to define causal treatment effects, one…
Descriptors: Computation, Regression (Statistics), Statistical Bias, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fu, Zhi-Hui; Tao, Jian; Shi, Ning-Zhong; Zhang, Ming; Lin, Nan – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
Multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) models can be applied to longitudinal educational surveys where a group of individuals are administered different tests over time with some common items. However, computational problems typically arise as the dimension of the latent variables increases. This is especially true when the latent variable…
Descriptors: Simulation, Foreign Countries, Longitudinal Studies, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Austin, Peter C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
Propensity score methods allow investigators to estimate causal treatment effects using observational or nonrandomized data. In this article we provide a practical illustration of the appropriate steps in conducting propensity score analyses. For illustrative purposes, we use a sample of current smokers who were discharged alive after being…
Descriptors: Smoking, Hospitals, Program Effectiveness, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Lijuan; Zhang, Zhiyong; McArdle, John J.; Salthouse, Timothy A. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2008
Score limitation at the top of a scale is commonly termed "ceiling effect." Ceiling effects can lead to serious artifactual parameter estimates in most data analysis. This study examines the consequences of ceiling effects in longitudinal data analysis and investigates several methods of dealing with ceiling effects through Monte Carlo simulations…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Little, Todd D. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1997
Practical and theoretical issues are discussed for testing the comparability, or measurement equivalence, of psychological constructs and detecting possible sociocultural differences on the constructs in cross-cultural research designs. Issues are explicated in the framework of multiple-group mean and covariance structure analyses. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies, Sociocultural Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morey, Leslie C.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1983
Twenty-three different methods of cluster analysis were compared in a four-stage sequential validation design. Results demonstrated that the solution given by Ward's method of cluster analysis was particularly powerful in comparison to solutions yielded by other techniques. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Alcoholism, Cluster Analysis, Comparative Analysis, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shieh, Gwowen – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2003
Repeated measures and longitudinal studies arise often in social and behavioral science research. During the planning stage of such studies, the calculations of sample size are of particular interest to the investigators and should be an integral part of the research projects. In this article, we consider the power and sample size calculations for…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Behavioral Science Research, Monte Carlo Methods, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McArdle, J. Jack – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1984
The many methodological contributions of Raymond B. Cattell to multivariate analysis are discussed in terms of contemporary issues in structural equation modeling. His factor analytic approach is compared with current modeling practices. A critical evaluation finds much of Cattell's work still innovative, technically advanced, and valuable to…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Estimation (Mathematics), Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tang, K. Linda; Algina, James – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1993
Type I error rates of four multivariate tests (Pilai-Bartlett trace, Johansen's test, James' first-order test, and James' second-order test) were compared for heterogeneous covariance matrices in 360 simulated experiments. The superior performance of Johansen's test and James' second-order test is discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Equations (Mathematics)