Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Models | 3 |
Validity | 2 |
Diaries | 1 |
Employee Attitudes | 1 |
Employer Employee Relationship | 1 |
Error Patterns | 1 |
Factor Analysis | 1 |
Goodness of Fit | 1 |
Interaction | 1 |
Interpersonal Communication | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 3 |
Author
DuVernet, Amy M. | 1 |
Hox, Joop J. | 1 |
Johnson, Emily C. | 1 |
Jones-Farmer, L. Allison | 1 |
Kleiboer, Annet M. | 1 |
Meade, Adam W. | 1 |
Pitts, Jennifer P. | 1 |
Rainer, R. Kelly | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Johnson, Emily C.; Meade, Adam W.; DuVernet, Amy M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance (MI) require a referent indicator (RI) for model identification. Although the assumption that the RI is perfectly invariant across groups is acknowledged as problematic, the literature provides relatively little guidance for researchers to identify the conditions under which the practice…
Descriptors: Measurement, Validity, Factor Analysis, Models
Hox, Joop J.; Kleiboer, Annet M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
This study describes a comparison between retrospective questions and daily diaries inquiring about positive and negative support in spousal interactions. The design was a multitrait-multimethod matrix with trait factors of positive and negative support, and method factors of retrospective questions and daily asked questions. Five questions were…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Interviews, Diaries, Spouses
Jones-Farmer, L. Allison; Pitts, Jennifer P.; Rainer, R. Kelly – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
Although SAS PROC CALIS is not designed to perform multigroup comparisons, it is believed that SAS can be "tricked" into doing so for groups of equal size. At present, there are no comprehensive examples of the steps involved in performing a multigroup comparison in SAS. The purpose of this article is to illustrate these steps. We demonstrate…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Measurement Techniques, Interpersonal Communication