Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 27 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 52 |
Comparative Analysis | 52 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 47 |
Simulation | 43 |
Test Items | 25 |
Item Response Theory | 17 |
Estimation (Mathematics) | 10 |
Computer Simulation | 9 |
Item Analysis | 9 |
Mathematical Models | 9 |
Scoring | 9 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 34 |
Reports - Research | 29 |
Reports - Evaluative | 19 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 9 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 3 |
Dissertations/Theses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Law School Admission Test | 2 |
Center for Epidemiologic… | 1 |
College Board Achievement… | 1 |
National Council Licensure… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kárász, Judit T.; Széll, Krisztián; Takács, Szabolcs – Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 2023
Purpose: Based on the general formula, which depends on the length and difficulty of the test, the number of respondents and the number of ability levels, this study aims to provide a closed formula for the adaptive tests with medium difficulty (probability of solution is p = 1/2) to determine the accuracy of the parameters for each item and in…
Descriptors: Test Length, Probability, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Wang, Keyin – ProQuest LLC, 2017
The comparison of item-level computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and multistage adaptive testing (MST) has been researched extensively (e.g., Kim & Plake, 1993; Luecht et al., 1996; Patsula, 1999; Jodoin, 2003; Hambleton & Xing, 2006; Keng, 2008; Zheng, 2012). Various CAT and MST designs have been investigated and compared under the same…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2016
Meijer and van Krimpen-Stoop noted that the number of person-fit statistics (PFSs) that have been designed for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) is relatively modest. This article partially addresses that concern by suggesting three new PFSs for CATs. The statistics are based on tests for a change point and can be used to detect an abrupt change…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Goodness of Fit
Moothedath, Shana; Chaporkar, Prasanna; Belur, Madhu N. – Perspectives in Education, 2016
In recent years, the computerised adaptive test (CAT) has gained popularity over conventional exams in evaluating student capabilities with desired accuracy. However, the key limitation of CAT is that it requires a large pool of pre-calibrated questions. In the absence of such a pre-calibrated question bank, offline exams with uncalibrated…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Hula, William D.; Kellough, Stacey; Fergadiotis, Gerasimos – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2015
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a computerized adaptive test (CAT) version of the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal, & Brecher, 1996), to reduce test length while maximizing measurement precision. This article is a direct extension of a companion article (Fergadiotis, Kellough, & Hula, 2015),…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Naming, Test Construction
Fomenko, Julie Ann Schwein – ProQuest LLC, 2017
Twenty-first-century healthcare is a complex and demanding arena. Today's hospital environment is more complex than in previous years while patients move through the system at a much faster pace. Newly graduated nurses are challenged in their first year with the healthcare needs of complex patients. Nurse educators and nurse leaders differ in…
Descriptors: Simulation, Nurses, Nursing Education, Competence
Pohl, Steffi – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2013
This article introduces longitudinal multistage testing (lMST), a special form of multistage testing (MST), as a method for adaptive testing in longitudinal large-scale studies. In lMST designs, test forms of different difficulty levels are used, whereas the values on a pretest determine the routing to these test forms. Since lMST allows for…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Longitudinal Studies, Difficulty Level, Comparative Analysis
Zhang, Jinming; Li, Jie – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
An IRT-based sequential procedure is developed to monitor items for enhancing test security. The procedure uses a series of statistical hypothesis tests to examine whether the statistical characteristics of each item under inspection have changed significantly during CAT administration. This procedure is compared with a previously developed…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory
Seo, Dong Gi; Weiss, David J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2015
Most computerized adaptive tests (CATs) have been studied using the framework of unidimensional item response theory. However, many psychological variables are multidimensional and might benefit from using a multidimensional approach to CATs. This study investigated the accuracy, fidelity, and efficiency of a fully multidimensional CAT algorithm…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Accuracy, Fidelity
Kim, Jiseon; Chung, Hyewon; Dodd, Barbara G.; Park, Ryoungsun – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
This study compared various panel designs of the multistage test (MST) using mixed-format tests in the context of classification testing. Simulations varied the design of the first-stage module. The first stage was constructed according to three levels of test information functions (TIFs) with three different TIF centers. Additional computerized…
Descriptors: Test Format, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing
Ali, Usama S.; Chang, Hua-Hua – ETS Research Report Series, 2014
Adaptive testing is advantageous in that it provides more efficient ability estimates with fewer items than linear testing does. Item-driven adaptive pretesting may also offer similar advantages, and verification of such a hypothesis about item calibration was the main objective of this study. A suitability index (SI) was introduced to adaptively…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Simulation, Pretests Posttests, Test Items
Finkelman, Matthew D.; Smits, Niels; Kim, Wonsuk; Riley, Barth – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale is a well-known self-report instrument that is used to measure depressive symptomatology. Respondents who take the full-length version of the CES-D are administered a total of 20 items. This article investigates the use of curtailment and stochastic curtailment (SC), two sequential…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Depression (Psychology), Test Length, Computer Assisted Testing
Yao, Lihua – Psychometrika, 2012
Multidimensional computer adaptive testing (MCAT) can provide higher precision and reliability or reduce test length when compared with unidimensional CAT or with the paper-and-pencil test. This study compared five item selection procedures in the MCAT framework for both domain scores and overall scores through simulation by varying the structure…
Descriptors: Item Banks, Test Length, Simulation, Adaptive Testing
Veldkamp, Bernard P. – Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 2010
Application of Bayesian item selection criteria in computerized adaptive testing might result in improvement of bias and MSE of the ability estimates. The question remains how to apply Bayesian item selection criteria in the context of constrained adaptive testing, where large numbers of specifications have to be taken into account in the item…
Descriptors: Selection, Criteria, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing
Thompson, Nathan A. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2011
Computerized classification testing (CCT) is an approach to designing tests with intelligent algorithms, similar to adaptive testing, but specifically designed for the purpose of classifying examinees into categories such as "pass" and "fail." Like adaptive testing for point estimation of ability, the key component is the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Classification, Probability